Hi! > I have not been criticizing the CD making or even itself but just > the fact that these are called *matrices*... > Why did you not call these linear-morphisms or something of this sort? > > I find matrix1 fully misleading.
OK, so we should (in principle, not really) move the linalg-definition of matrices as a data-container into matrix1 and "our" definition into linalg :) Best, Peter -- Peter Horn, University of Kassel * Computational Mathematics Group * * Heinrich Plett Str. 40, 34132 Kassel * [S] [C] [I] [E] [n] [c] [e] Phone: + 4 9 - 5 6 1 - 8 0 4 - 4 1 9 2 * http://www.symcomp.org Fax: + 4 9 - 5 6 1 - 8 0 4 - 4 6 4 6 * E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * http://kassel.symcomp.org/ * _______________________________________________ Om3 mailing list [email protected] http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om3
