David Carlisle skrev: > Thanks for raising that again. Returning to the issue, I now recall I later spotted another error: In Figure 3.1, the closing </OMA> of the outermost <OMA> is missing in the right column. (Also, "Unshared vs. shared representations" might be a better caption, as that is the order they appear in.)
>> As the 2.0 standard is over four years old, I found it a bit unlikely >> that such an error would have gone unnoticed for this long > > probably no one tried using the hex literal form so never noticed the > schema didn't allow it. I'd > > >> * There appears to be no information on how to report errors. >> (Unlike the case with the MathML standards, which carry a notice >> asking that errors are reported to [email protected].) > > I think this list is it although I agree the website, and prefereably > the document itself ought to have said /say that. OK. Is it expected that non-subscribers can report errors? I, for one, noticed and tried to report the hexadecimal issue before I subscribed, but that mail never got delivered to the list. Lars Hellström _______________________________________________ Om mailing list [email protected] http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om
