On Saturday 09 May 2009 00:36:31 Professor James Davenport wrote: > > Indeed, assuming the existence of such a function x(i) seems more elegant > > That's a good point we seem to keep skating round this problem.
I do not quite understand what you mean by that comment -- do you mean that we are still a bit fuzzy and don't nail down the exact semantics of the things we're talking about? Cheers, Christoph -- Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Om mailing list [email protected] http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om
