On Sun, July 18, 2010 12:40 pm, Michael Kohlhase begin_of_the_skype_highlighting end_of_the_skype_highlighting wrote: > Dear James, > > this is a very impressive record of the part of CICM you witnessed. > > May I humbly suggest that it would be even better if you used a publich > blog system (whith the appropriate keywords CICM2010, CCA2010, MKM2010, > ...) for the posts? That would make the conferences more visible to the > outside world, as blog posts are indexed by search engines (whereas > papers are not). Also people could answer to your posts. Good point, though I am not sure I mean theseto be open day for permanent dialogue. They ARE linked off my home apge, and I believe Google follows them, though a rapid attempt to check this didn't prove convincing. I'll have to check in more detail. > I know that using LaTeX in a local editor is more convenient than using > a blog engine, but the added publicity has its value as well. If you do But also allows me to contrustc all the business mintes etc by \include, whci I don't see how to do otherwise. > not have access to a blog engine, then we would be happy to make you an > account on the KWARC blog. I believe I have enough blogs available to me.
On a different front, I did well by MENTIONING a LaTeX article in a blog, and people said they had all read it. Maybe I should do this. James Davenport Lecturer on XX10190, CM30070, CM30078/50123, CM50209 Hebron & Medlock Professor of Information Technology, University of Bath OpenMath Content Dictionary Editor and Programme Chair, OpenMath 2009 IMU Committee on Electronic Information and Communication Council of the British Computer Society Federal Council, International Foundation for Computational Logic _______________________________________________ Om mailing list [email protected] http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om
