Hi Paul, you can imagine that I welcome most of these suggestions. I believe that OpenMath CD authoring practice has shown that these …
2010-07-19 22:43 Paul Libbrecht <[email protected]>: > I'm all for grouping and marking with an identifier any FMP. > I note that CMPs are wished in several languages and to contain > mathematical formulæ (as wel as... a bit more). … are clearly needed. On your request for further metadata-like information beyond CMP, our opinions diverge again, even though I don't doubt that … > I note that identifiers are not the same as titles and that titles are > also needed and in multiple languages (the notation-census collects an > amount of them already). … such information is also needed in practice. But my personal favorite way would be supporting arbitrary metadata by incorporation of RDFa, as there will always be the (n+1)st metadata field, which some application may need, but which has not been hard-coded into the OpenMath standard. But then, on the other hand, I am well aware of previous discussions about RDFa-based metadata and David's argument that there might be a lot of software out there, which is interested in OpenMath CDs but not interested in supporting RDF(a) in all its complexity. > That's all "being baked" for OpenMath 3, right? > > Would you add somewhere there also the links within a child of property? Do you mean links to external data, e.g. DLMF? Well, by RDFa that would be trivial. But if we don't embed RDFa into the OCD format (and that's what I consider most likely), I wouldn't want to reinvent a crippled RDF for CDs and rather maintain such links as "stand-off markup" in external RDF files. Cheers, Christoph -- Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Om mailing list [email protected] http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om
