Dear all, 2010-07-31 15:09 Christoph LANGE <[email protected]>: > I was quite surprised to find references to OpenMath and even OMDoc in the > TEI specification. Are you aware of people in the humanities using it? > > See > http://kwarc.info/blog/2010/07/31/tei-guidelines-mention-mathml-openmath-and-omdoc/
the TEI spec contains some wrong, outdated references to OpenMath, which we should report to them. But that should first be coordinated here, before, maybe, an official representative of the OMSoc contacts them. As you can see in http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/FT.html#FTFOR, quite some information is outdated: * They mention MathML 2, which should soon be updated to MathML 3. * They mention OpenMath and MathML as two different, complementary standards. That should be updated w.r.t. the alignment of OpenMath and Content MathML. * They mention the ancient history of OpenMath (the Esprit project), which is probably no longer necessary in that place. * They link to http://www.openmath.org/V2/standard/index.html and several subpages, none of which exists. Cheers, Christoph -- Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Om mailing list [email protected] http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om
