Hi Tom, two quick question.
1) The name of the attribute "kind" might be confused with the proposed MathML4 attribute "kind" https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/80, also https://github.com/mathml-refresh/mathml/issues/68 Is that something you are aware of? 2) What are the advantages over a generic http://www.jsonml.org/ or the custom https://github.com/lurchmath/openmath-js/blob/master/docs/api-reference.md#writingsaving-openmath-objects (cf. http://mailman.openmath.org/pipermail/om/2018-May/thread.html) ? Best Moritz http://moritzschubotz.de | +49 1578 047 1397 On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:08 AM Tom Wiesing <tom.wies...@fau.de> wrote: > > Dear all, > > Me and Michael would like to propose an extension of the OpenMath standard to > endorse an OpenMath JSON Encoding. We have made a pull request at [0] and > attached a diffed pdf. > > JSON is a lightweight data-interchange format used heavily in the Web > Applications area. Adding a JSON Encoding thus contributes to making OpenMath > web-interoperable. The source code for a validator of this proposed encoding, > as well as a translator from/to the XML encoding can be found at [1]. It is > also accessible via API at [2]. > > We presented this encoding during the OpenMath workshop at CICM 2018 (see [3] > and [4]), however we were only able to make a concrete standard proposal > until now. We are hoping to discuss this during the upcoming OpenMath > workshop at CICM 2019 next week, however wanted to send out our proposal > beforehand. > > Greetings, > Tom > > [0] https://github.com/OpenMath/OMSTD/pull/69 > [1] https://github.com/tkw1536/OpenMath-JSON > [2] https://omjson.openmath.org > [3] http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2307/paper53.pdf > [4] https://www.cicm-conference.org/2018/slides/OpMa2.pdf _______________________________________________ Om mailing list Om@openmath.org http://mailman.openmath.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/om
