On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:23:27PM -0400, Chris Siebenmann wrote: > (On the other hand, maybe 'deferred free' is not blocks that are going > to be freed but instead blocks serving as indexes to etc, in which case > this might be a significant number. I don't have data from anything > else to cross-check against.)
Not sure; you could ask on the zfs developer list, but their first response will probably be to update to a more current system :). Here's zdb output from one of my production pools that's not misbehaving. It's a backup for another box so it pretty much gets zfs recv all day and it has async destroy enabled: Blocks LSIZE PSIZE ASIZE avg comp %Total Type 4.55K 60.9M 30.1M 90.3M 19.8K 2.02 0.39 deferred free FWIW :). _______________________________________________ OmniOS-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss
