I switched back to 014 for now, it was too bad to inflict on my users. I have some new systems coming in soon that I'll test on r151022 before making them live. I will start with the NFS defaults.
-Chip On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Dan McDonald <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Aug 24, 2017, at 8:41 AM, Schweiss, Chip <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I just move one of my production systems to OmniOS CE 151022m from > 151014 and my NFS performance has tanked. > > > > Here's a snapshot of nfssvrtop: > > > > 2017 Aug 24 07:34:39, load: 1.54, read: 5427 KB, swrite: 104 > KB, awrite: 9634 KB > > Ver Client NFSOPS Reads SWrites AWrites Commits Rd_bw > SWr_bw AWr_bw Rd_t SWr_t AWr_t Com_t Align% > > 3 10.28.17.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > 3 all 0 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > 4 10.28.17.1 9 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > 4 10.28.16.160 17 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > 4 10.28.16.127 20 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > 4 10.28.16.113 74 6 6 0 0 48 > 56 0 1366 20824 0 0 100 > > 4 10.28.16.64 338 16 0 36 3 476 > 0 1065 120 0 130 117390 100 > > 4 10.28.16.54 696 68 0 91 5 2173 > 0 2916 52 0 93 142083 100 > > 4 all 1185 90 6 127 8 2697 > 56 3996 151 20824 104 133979 100 > > > > The pool is not doing anything but serving NFS. Before the upgrade, > the pool would sustain 20k NFS ops. > > > > Is there some significant change in NFS that I need to adjust its tuning? > > Oh my. > > I'd start pinging the illumos list on this. Also, are there any special > tweaks you made in the 014 configuration? IF you did, I'd start back > removing them and seeing what a default system does, just in case. > > I know Delphix and Nexenta still care about NFS quite a bit, so I can't > believe something would be that bad. > > Maintainers: Check for NFS changes RIGHT AFTER 022 closed for blanket > upstream pull-ins. Maybe it closed during a poor-performance window? > > Dan > >
_______________________________________________ OmniOS-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss
