James Carlson wrote: > Evan Yan writes: > >> I also thought about Device Driver community. The reason I chose ON >> community is that IRM is part of the framework not actual drivers. >> > It's part of the framework, but the primary (perhaps only) consumer of > the interfaces would be the device drivers written to use it. Given > that, I would expect that the device driver community would have a > keen interest in seeing that the project supports the driver work > being done, and that the new drivers now being written will make use > of IRM when needed. > Yes, IRM has close relationships with device drivers. We probably should ask for Device Driver community's sponsorship as well.
> Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see that the ON community has > a similar interest. > By definition, ON community is about the core operation system and networking components. From this point of view, I guess IRM should be part of ON. Doesn't that count for the interest of ON community? So I think IRM should be endorsed by both of ON and Device Driver community, maybe Performance community as well. Thanks, -Evan
