Cyril Plisko wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:18 PM, John Forte <John.Forte at sun.com> wrote: > >> It wasn't meant to be a review of the code, only a representation of where >> the code will reside and a review for the new and modified makefiles. The >> code itself was reviewed as each project integrated. In a lot of cases, that >> is many years ago. >> >> Sorry if I caused any confusion here. This a merge effort to consolidate the >> consolidations, not a new project(s) integration. >> >> > > So should the issues I pointed out be addressed, postponed or ignored ? > > > Certainly not ignored. If you have comments and you believe they are bugworthy or just want to discuss them or fix them or something else, please do as it is definitely encouraged, but on a separate thread. My only point is that the code was already delivered as part of the Network Storage consolidation so if you do want to comment, I would just ask that you refrain from doing so against this merge effort.
- John
