When working with ON I'm faced with an interesting complication at times 
in that I need to identify the license to a patch.  A situation where 
this already exists in ON is with krb.. Some (most) is MIT, but the Sun 
parts are licensed under CDDL.. (Not the concern here at all and just an 
example)  However, one of the reasons I think that Sun *must* currently 
have copyright to all new patches from external contributors is so that 
they can track the legalities of code in case of the need for future 
vetting/lawyer bs.. etc..

To be honest.. I'm not proposing this feature be included in ON now or 
any time in the future.. However.. with my side work everything will be 
readily available to those interested.. (Such as trying to maintain a 
diff from mit-krb vanilla vs the Sun patches)  Another side affect of 
this will possibly be better long term manageability/auditing for the 
larger packages. (perl. etc..)

I ramble too much..

bottom line:
Is being able to track a license to a patch valuable to anyone else? yes/no

Thanks

./C


ps. (yes I assume this is already somewhat available by referencing 
patches in some external/internal bug tracker, but with my build changes 
I can enforce policy which would block the code from buliding entirely)

Reply via email to