On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:38:28AM -0400, James Carlson wrote: > > Would this case also obsolete /etc/default/fs (I don't know offhand if > > anything else cares about that?). > > If this project doesn't obsolete it (and remove the default_fs(4) man > page), then I think it should respect the file by using that value as > the default file system type in case libfstyp doesn't recognize the > file system.
Which has the effect of giving a confusing error message... much better to obsolete it. > > What about /etc/dfs/fstypes (once > > again, not sure if anyone uses that)? > > I don't quite understand the relationship with that file. That's used > to identify "remote" file systems. > > (I suspect you're talking about the "use the first line" trickery > that [I think] is mostly involved with net booting. In that case, I > don't think any sort of change is needed. You're probably right: I didn't investigate. regards john
