On Mar 4, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Danek Duvall wrote:
> 
> Still, putting the messages into the moderation queue would be far
> friendlier than bouncing them outright.  The pkg-discuss moderation duties
> are quite small, and the normal list traffic there is pretty sizeable.  I
> imagine moderating on-discuss wouldn't be a huge burden.

I keep traffic stats actually:
                                   Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr   May   Jun   Jul   
Aug   Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec
on-discuss                          26   114     -     -     -     -     -     
-     -     -     -     -   140
pkg-discuss                        975   751     -     -     -     -     -     
-     -     -     -     -  1726

There are a number of lists who bounce/reject email from the non-subscribed 
which, along with those that silently discard, are something I've been trying 
to discourage and even make policy discouraging it in the cases where general 
public participation is actively encouraged, e.g. web-side forums with gateways 
to mailing lists. But, I think in this case the point is well met that you 
should be in possession of enough technical prowess to understand both the need 
and the method for subscription. Reject or hold comes down to the semantics of 
who your audience/subscribers is/are and if you care that more people will be 
irate when rejected rather than held for moderation. It does tend to raise the 
bar on technical/dev lists.

I think I've managed to reduce the amount of spam getting as far as the 
moderation queue to a minimum, with the exception of spam in French which 
always seems to go to indiana and cifs, which makes moderation less of a 
pointless chore for those who fear moderation would be a deluge of spam. And I 
clear the mod queue at least once a day...but I probably shouldn't admit to 
that in public. :) 

Those with one or more addresses who don't want to receive list mail can always 
either request a specific whitelist entry by the list owner or they can always 
subscribe and tick the 'no mail' box in their subscription management panel via 
the mailman web interface. I had no objections to specific username at domain 
whitelist entries in mailman, only the large blanket and, often wildly 
incorrect, sun.com whitelist entries.

e.

Reply via email to