On Jul 14, 2010, at 6:25 PM, ольга крыжановская <olga.kryzhanov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> James, ksh93 is getting thread support this year. The current ksh93u- > alpha has already much of the code changes required for thread support > and at the end of the ksh93u development cycle there will be a build > switch to choose between thread and no thread support. The switch will > be ON by default for ksh93v. I understand. The point I was making was that since it currently does not make heavy use of multithreading, any theoretical problems with fork() or the posix_spawn() interfaces caused by MT behavior can't be related to any performance problems currently seen. What's needed is a detailed analysis of the overall problem, and not a leap to a solution. But if you want to leap anyway, then I agree with Bart: the magic of the proposed new syscall needs to be demonstrated with real code, not just guessed about. _______________________________________________ on-discuss mailing list on-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/on-discuss
