On 08/ 5/10 11:37 AM, Michael Lim wrote: > I've used this method before to test my bits, but recently it has failed > to upgrade the BE > > 1) install opensolaris from netinstall > > 2) onu -d > /net/x4600m2-sfb-01/exportz/ml37995/onnv-fixes4-s/packages/sparc/nightly-nd > -t dupcpu > > After onu completes and I reboot, the system is running the new BE, > but it is a clone of the original opensolaris install. I changed the > publisher to ipkg as advised by the 8/4 flag day before onu, but it > still didn't work.
If you're referring to my note about unusable repositories, then it did not advise such a change. It called out that repositories built between Monday evening and yesterday, including those posted to on-nightly, could not be used for upgrade. The on-nightly repository is once again functional, as it now contains bits built with my fix. > r...@ns-t2000-21:~# beadm list > BE Active Mountpoint Space Policy Created > -- ------ ---------- ----- ------ ------- > cpu-test - - 798.07M static 2010-07-01 21:52 > dupcpu NR / 6.27G static 2010-08-05 05:51 > flowacct - - 1.37G static 2010-07-29 15:45 > flowacct-2 - - 1.36G static 2010-08-02 06:53 > flowacct-3 - - 1.46G static 2010-08-03 09:16 > opensolaris - - 89.52M static 2010-06-30 10:21 > opensolaris-1 - - 1.22G static 2010-07-23 15:06 > snv_145 - - 1.19G static 2010-08-04 14:24 > > (this method worked for the series of flowacct tests i ran earlier this > week) > > r...@ns-t2000-21:~# uname -a > SunOS ns-t2000-21 5.11 snv_142 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200 Solaris > ^^^^^^^ original opensolaris build > > r...@ns-t2000-21:~# pkg publisher > PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI > opensolaris.org (non-sticky, preferred) origin online > http://ipkg.sfbay/dev/ > on-nightly (disabled) origin online > http://localhost:13000/ > local origin online > http://netinstall-osol.sfbay:9000/ > on-extra (disabled) origin online > http://localhost:13001/ > r...@ns-t2000-21:~# > > Is there something wrong with my build packages? Does your repository contain consolidation/osnet/osnet-incorporation? Did you build them after pulling my fix, or before? --Mark > Did I miss a step somewhere? > > Thanks, > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > on-ips-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/on-ips-dev _______________________________________________ on-ips-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/on-ips-dev
