On the one hand, VID already has a portal integration.

To answer your questions in a more broad way I don’t think we want to go about 
creating GUIs for each specific use case (but I guess if the community does 
they can reply and keep me honest) and that is what I got as the output from a 
read of your project proposal. The idea in my opinion is to add capabilities to 
the platform. When you look at it that way I see 3 gui areas Service Design, 
Service Instantiation and Service Lifecycle. Service design is already covered 
by sdc and that project. Service Instantiation is covered by VID and service 
lifecycle is covered by appc gui, which may or may not be open sourced right 
now I am not sure but I am sure we would be ok with doing so if its not. Then 
if the release 1 use cases need enhancements t that we should implement them 
generically and any vnf can use it. I certainly don’t want to build the same 
thing for vcpe and volte!

Either way I don’t know what exactly your project is looking to do. Can you 
clarify your project proposal a bit so vi d can better work together with you?

Thanks,
Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of shentao
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 3:52 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; HEMLI, 
AMICHAI <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [onap-discuss] Question on VID

Hi, Michael and Helmi

I’m working for UseCase UI project and found that there is a relationship 
between UseCase UI and VID project.
I’ve looked through the VID proposal and have some questions about VID project.
Could you help me to confirm questions about VID project. Thank you very much.


1.       Is VID project planning to provide a portal component which will 
integrate into Portal Platform?



2.       If VID project provides a portal component, what detail functions will 
be provided?

UseCase UI project will support managements of service & VNF lifecycle, I don’t 
know whether VID has a duplicate scope because there is service & VNF 
description in VID scope.



3.       In UseCase UI proposal, seed code is linking to VID’s repo 
(https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/admin/projects/vid<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_-23_admin_projects_vid&d=DwMFbw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2wwdGZ3YcpSivQ2Kio028A&m=s_pnutB5B1kDdiy98MfuTyx1YYlN1nrqG9i5z1LqUdA&s=tek-4tg2eYSYZLZvjfjE7XVCYwz7CRpJTeTU5YsvVrw&e=>).

Does it mean that VID repo is currently including seed code of UseCase UI (vCPE 
or VoLTE)?

This involves question2 that I don’t know why UseCase UI’s seed code is in 
VID’s repo.


Best regards,
Tao Shen


---------------------------------------------
沈涛
中国移动通信有限公司研究院网络技术研究所
中国北京市西城区宣武门西大街32号(100053)

Shen Tao
China Mobile Research Institute
No.32 Xuanwumen west street,Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China

Tel: +86 15801696688-34070
Mobile: +86 13521591389
Email:  [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to