Thanks Daniel. I do have a follow up query. Adding to what Dhananjay has
quoted, should the decomposition of network service be taken care
automatically by service orchestrator ?

If we see Open -O or XOS/CORD, the story remains same . We provide NSD and
the master orchestrator takes the burden of decomposing network service
requirements, identify dependencies w.r.t infrastructure ( NF -O ) and
network ( SDN-O ) , along with life cycle work flow.

Is there any reason ( architectururaly ) , why MSO isn't involved here ?

BR,
Viswa

On Jun 1, 2017 9:47 PM, "Dhananjay Pavgi" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks, Daniel. Few related questions as below:
>
>
>
> 1.       When it comes to “Service Instantiation” on VNFs; don’t we need
> Yang models.
>
> 2.       i.e. what does finally SDNC send as a payload over Netconf?
>
> 3.       Also, our understanding of APIs being called is as below (which
> is right now manual activity in vFW demo):
>
> a.       Run demo.sh init script (We will share these details but
> essentially it invokes AAI REST APIs)
>
> b.       Service Instance Create
>
> c.       VNF Create
>
> d.       Run demo.sh preload (We will share these details but essentially
> it invokes SDNC REST APIs)
>
> e.       VF Module Create
>
> f.        Run demo.sh appc script (We will share these details but
> essentially it invokes APPC REST APIs)
>
> 4.       Ideally, 3a through 3f above should be handled by “Service
> Orchestrator”, right?
>
>
>
> thanks & regards,
>
> Dhananjay Pavgi
>
> Mobile : +91 98220 22264
>
> [image: cid:[email protected]]               [image:
> ONAP_logo_Sig]
>
> www.techmahindra.com                 Platinum Member. Visit :
> http://www.onap.org
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@
> lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *ROSE, DANIEL V
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 01, 2017 7:54 PM
> *To:* Viswa KSP <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] Why there is a manual step before deploying
> a distributed / certified network service?
>
>
>
> The demo is specifically just a demo. So the stuff in the demo like the
> robot scripts will not work for other vnfs. The mechanisms used in the
> scripts will work with any vnfs however.
>
>
>
> To give you an example, preload command calls sdnc rest api that loads
> info like IPs to sdnc so that when you go to vid and instantiate a vnf sdnc
> knows what data to use. You can call that api yourself to fill in your
> specific parameters for ANY vnf ( you can add a call to the DG to make a
> call out to any external system via rest instead of doing the preload
> also). In the rebase code VID has the option to provide those preloads as
> part of the GUI to make it a bit easier but even though the flow changes
> the fact that it applies to all VNFs does not change.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel Rose
>
> ECOMP / ONAP
>
> com.att.ecomp
>
> 732-420-7308
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@
> lists.onap.org <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Viswa
> KSP
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 01, 2017 4:50 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [onap-discuss] Why there is a manual step before deploying a
> distributed / certified network service?
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> We are trying to follow the steps as per tutorial to bring demo vFirewall
> Network service.
>
> While the steps before deploy operation ( i.e creation of license model,
> design-test-certify cycle for VSP, VF & NS and finally distributing NS for
> production ) seems to be generic & acceptable for other VNFs, the step for
> running demo.sh in robot VM to enable "Deploy" in VID seems to very
> specific to vFirewall NS.
>
>
>
> I would like to understand if this manual step is expected in any other
> NS? What if we wanna customize the work-flow i.e say I want to just design
> my NS and just deploy it right away ( without other steps as per demo
> work-flow ) , how should I go-about in achieving this?
>
>
>
> On a very high-level, I would like to know how much we can customize ONAP ?
>
>
>
>  BR,
>
> Viswa
>
> ============================================================
> ================================================================
>
> Disclaimer:  This message and the information contained herein is
> proprietary and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy
> statement, you may review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/
> Disclaimer.html externally http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html
> internally within TechMahindra.
>
> ============================================================
> ================================================================
>
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to