Hi there,



After I went through the proposal page of OOM, I feel sort of confused on one 
point. I hope guys for OOM could help to figure it out.

To my understanding, one of the responsibilities of OOM is to manage the 
lifecycle of the ONAP components, as is mentioned on the page "The users can 
also deploy ONAP instances, a component, or a change to a software module 
within a component". But for some components, they have their own controllers 
to manage the lifecycle of their sub-components. Take DCAE for example, 
onboarding of microservices is currently being performed by the DCAE controller 
for analytics applications and data collectors. How does OOM cope with such 
kind of scenario? Will OOM take over the responsibility of the lifecycle 
management of sub-projects/sub-modules?




Regards,

Guangrong
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to