Hello Josef, vm_base_name is to avoid confusion. You can have multiple vm1_component_name, because OpenStack uses UUID not VM names, but you will be confused. vm_base_name is independent from DNS configuration. The DNS configuration doesn’t require any change, it’s just a FQDM-IP address mapping, but the FQDN doesn’t need to necessarily match the VM name (indeed, despite some similarity, it doesn’t).
Hope this helps. Thanks, Marco From: <onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> on behalf of Josef Reisinger <josef.reisin...@de.ibm.com> Date: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 at 8:55 AM To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-discuss] Is it ok to replace the value of vm_base_name "vm1" to "vm2" in the ONAP HEAT template? Folks, I am running currently two independent ONAP environments. To avoid to be too confused, I changed the value of parameter vm_base_name from "vm1" to "vm2", I am not sure that this is consistently configured throughout the environment as I see a log of entries with "vm1" in the name in the dns server config. Liekwise I assume this is is true for the VMs which use host names to connect to each other. Should I better revert to "vm1" for both environments for the next stack creation? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Josef Reisinger
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
