Hi Shashank / Victor,

Great initiative. Does this vagrant aid only in docker builds or does it
support deployment as well - something like ONAP in a laptop also possible ?
Could you also comment on resource requirements ?

BR,
Viswa

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Shankar, Shashank Kumar <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you very much for the details Manoop.
>
> Regards,
> Shashank
>
> From: "TALASILA, MANOOP (MANOOP)" <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 11:28 AM
> To: Shashank Kumar Shankar <[email protected]>
> Cc: "ROSE, DANIEL V" <[email protected]>, "Morales, Victor" <
> [email protected]>, "[email protected]" <
> [email protected]>
>
> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Standardizing docker-maven-plugin,
> com.spotify or io.fabric8
>
> Hi Shashank,
>
> Portal’s Jenkin's jobs checkout the ecomp-sdk folder from “ecompsdkos
> <https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/admin/projects/ecompsdkos>" repo. The same
> job executes the below shell script to build the portal container. I hope
> this helps.
>
> Here is the reference to one of the Portal’s Jenkins job:
> https://jenkins.onap.org/view/portal/job/portal-docker-
> master-merge-docker-script/configure
>
> Regards,
> Manoop Talasila
> AT&T Labs Research
> 1 AT&T Way, Bedminster, NJ 07921
> ····························································
> Office:   +1 (908)901 2158 | e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
> "This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are AT&T property,
> are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or
> entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named
> recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received
> this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message
> immediately from your computer. Any other uses, retention, dissemination,
> forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited."
>
> On Jun 13, 2017, at 2:21 PM, Shankar, Shashank Kumar <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for the info. We also had another question regarding the local
> build of portal container. It looks like the os_build_febe.sh script in
> portal expects to have a directory named ecomp-sdk as seen in [1] in the
> root directory. But it seems like there is no directory named ecomp-sdk
>  there [2]. Any idea from where the SDK folder gets created or is it left
> out?
>
>
> [1] - https://git.onap.org/portal/tree/deliveries/os_build_febe.sh#n33
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.onap.org_portal_tree_deliveries_os-5Fbuild-5Ffebe.sh-23n33&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=WrNqy1qTY6qs8trIiLe-U2OvGp0SXnE4nO3a-LJ-q_w&m=9kcWxXd3Er0kISsFneyOtJtqLNooDSp4TfmuEf61S7A&s=qVyH0UDP83xEA-JyL8BGB-XYx1nqqW9EnQtpqVJpOow&e=>
> [2] - https://git.onap.org/portal/tree/
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.onap.org_portal_tree_&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=WrNqy1qTY6qs8trIiLe-U2OvGp0SXnE4nO3a-LJ-q_w&m=9kcWxXd3Er0kISsFneyOtJtqLNooDSp4TfmuEf61S7A&s=iLi3F8MdOB5Nz2G4ILfTJ1Hr6SXI9vV5xV-8hUJ9TNI&e=>
>
> Regards,
> Shashank
>
> From: <[email protected]> on behalf of "ROSE, DANIEL V"
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 7:26 AM
> To: "Morales, Victor" <[email protected]>, "
> [email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Standardizing docker-maven-plugin,
> com.spotify or io.fabric8
>
> We currently build docker images via scripts, via fabric8 plugin and via
> Spotify plugin. Spotify and fabric8 should be easier to merge, the script
> way may be harder. I leave it to others to decide if we should standardize
>  J
>
> Daniel Rose
> ECOMP / ONAP
> com.att.ecomp
> 732-420-7308
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:onap-
> [email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Morales, Victor
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 13, 2017 10:23 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [onap-discuss] Standardizing docker-maven-plugin, com.spotify
> or io.fabric8
>
> Howdy,
>
> Shashank and I started a vagrant project to collect the set of
> instructions to build ONAP Docker Images[1]. What we have found is that not
> all the projects are building their images in the same way.  Even more,
> some of them uses different maven plugins, for example data-router that
> uses the Spotify plugin[2] and MSO uses Fabric8[3].  I’m not pretending to
> start a discussion about which is better but shouldn’t be better to keep
> one a standardize the method to build those images?
>
> Regards/Saludos
> Victor Morales
> irc: electrocucaracha
>
> [1] https://github.com/electrocucaracha/vagrant-onap/
> blob/master/lib/functions#L135-L154
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_electrocucaracha_vagrant-2Donap_blob_master_lib_functions-23L135-2DL154&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2wwdGZ3YcpSivQ2Kio028A&m=RewA7K8yAmaw4CPli1rONNj1D50vCHLdbJloDLb2H6I&s=SpElGUuQgrGiChtxw93tMs9UlAu2PIllH6Ov9ouoh9k&e=>
> [2] https://git.onap.org/aai/data-router/tree/pom.xml#n161
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.onap.org_aai_data-2Drouter_tree_pom.xml-23n161&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2wwdGZ3YcpSivQ2Kio028A&m=RewA7K8yAmaw4CPli1rONNj1D50vCHLdbJloDLb2H6I&s=iBMmiHFxvUguNUqfwqqFIt9QLnY9vRvRwe2fN0KTOVE&e=>
> [3] https://git.onap.org/mso/tree/packages/docker/pom.xml#n101
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.onap.org_mso_tree_packages_docker_pom.xml-23n101&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2wwdGZ3YcpSivQ2Kio028A&m=RewA7K8yAmaw4CPli1rONNj1D50vCHLdbJloDLb2H6I&s=goOLaTLEbE3uwXebXnQqo1jBlnHoZu2jZmgdLdtHjWg&e=>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> onap-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=
> LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=WrNqy1qTY6qs8trIiLe-U2OvGp0SXnE4nO3a-LJ-q_w&m=
> 9kcWxXd3Er0kISsFneyOtJtqLNooDSp4TfmuEf61S7A&s=
> Bs8DM2osd1n6a8eNxViyupUMv8q9wv6ovYWq_cnhu_o&e=
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> onap-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to