BTW, How does VNF packaging effort aligns with the already existing CSAR packaging code in SDC? Is this an effort to extract this functionality into a mS?
Zahi Kapeluto Lead Architect, Network Communications LOB AT&T Network Applications Development · SD&E Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey | Chicago ················································· Mobile: +972 (54) 6636831 Office: +972 (3) 9280064 From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Murali p <[email protected]> Date: Monday, 10 July 2017 at 15:20 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Christopher Donley (Chris)" <[email protected]> Subject: [onap-discuss] [vnfsdk] Regarding Story VNFSDK-18 and VNFSDK-31 Dear All, https://jira.onap.org/browse/VNFSDK-18<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_VNFSDK-2D18&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Tb4B9h_-wR6nA2dMKyowUg&m=ccnjqTyaavMSwDVp90p-vhp5x8iJ84wN0dqY56mXQn0&s=1HNMZTPrHldDwL3-DitLEbrgppYQD_cYFtpmnrAi6-k&e=> https://jira.onap.org/browse/VNFSDK-31 Until now I could not find any code in the repository for VVP (VNF Validation program). [As per my understanding]Since the above two stories are related to tools from VVP, how can we go ahead with these stories without analyzing or knowing VVP code. 1. I fear my effort may become duplicate without knowing what exists in VVP repo if I go ahead with implementation of above stories. 2. Link (interfaces) and high level flow between the related projects is not clear. Any help or suggestion is welcome. With regards, Murali _______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
