Currently we’re using what was defined for OPEN-O: https://wiki.open-o.org/display/GI/OPEN-O+Java+code+style, namely:
Google Java Style with some modifications: 4.2 Block indentation: +4 spaces 4.4 Column limit: 120 Gildas, any ideas where we should put this in the ONAP wiki? Thanks, Gary From: Alexis de Talhouët [mailto:adetalhoue...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 2:11 PM To: Gary Wu <gary.i...@huawei.com> Cc: LEFEVRE, CATHERINE <cl6...@intl.att.com>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] Refactor CLAMP to inherit from oparent On Jul 11, 2017, at 2:27 PM, Gary Wu <gary.i...@huawei.com<mailto:gary.i...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Catherine, In today’s Integration meeting, we discussed having CLAMP pilot trials around coding styles. In OPEN-O we centrally defined coding styles in the oparent project/repo, and it would be great if we can do likewise for ONAP so we can avoid duplicate or conflicting definitions across projects. Do you think we can have CLAMP do a pilot run on inheriting from oparent as well? Is there an place where the code style rules have been explained? I believe a wiki page to explain what are the agreed rules could help, similar to what ODL has here: https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/BestPractices/Coding_Guidelines#General_Code_Style At any rate, thanks for putting this up! It’s going to be a long journey to enforce checkstyle considering the amount of LoC in ONAP. Thanks, Alexis To recap the goals of oparent: centrally define shared parent POM definitions such as nexus (distributionManagement) location, coding styles, license checks, coding style checks, sonar setup, etc. To inherit from oparent: modify the project’s POM to ensure that all POM files ultimately inherit from <parent> <groupId>org.onap.oparent</groupId> <artifactId>oparent</artifactId> <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version> </parent> And also remove any local definitions within the project POMs around distributionManagement, coding styles, etc., so that those properties are derived from oparent instead. Please let us know if you run into anything that would require changes or enhancements to the oparent POMs. Thanks, Gary _______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
