Hi, CT –

Thanks for your feedback – it seems to me that making the process of getting 
new repos is made difficult by design in order to prevent an explosion of 
repositories for the LF to manage.  There are currently 30 approved projects 
with several still in proposed state; A&AI alone already has 18 repos and if 
all systems followed a similar trajectory there could be thousands of repos in 
short order.

I think your middle path makes good sense.  We would group similar functions 
together and manage the git history by tagging the commit message with the 
microservice/library – perhaps there is some JIRA integration we could do for 
git tagging to keep the history readable.  Since it will require some work to 
get there and we have what we need already for Amsterdam, I suggest that we 
target the Beijing release for this.

A&AI team, please weigh in on this – if you believe we should pursue a 
different strategy for the Beijing release than what CT proposes below, please 
speak up now.

Thanks,
jimmy

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of C.T. 
Paterson
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 5:01 PM
To: BYLSMA, SUSAN <[email protected]>
Cc: FORSYTH, JAMES <[email protected]>; [email protected]; MULLER, 
ANDREW <[email protected]>; PRESSLEY, VIVIAN A <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] FW: [onap-tsc] [aai] YOUR ACTION IS REQUIRED: A&AI 
Project needs new repos for microservices


I've been thinking about this since it was raised on last week's PTL call.  Our 
architecture have brought us a lot of flexibility and benefits - so I want to 
ensure that we adhere to the principles of our decomposition.  Microservices 
and libraries should be independently coded, built, published, and deployed.  
The best way to achieve this is independent repositories.

That being said, I also recognise that it's creating a large administrative 
overhead as well as some "hurry up and wait" for the development teams, given 
the TSC approval process we're currently observing.

It's certainly possible to maintain isolation of your code and artefacts with 
separate directories within one umbrella repository - I've been part of a team 
where we did just that.  It will require good discipline and governance on the 
part of the committers to ensure the independence is not breached.  The other 
downside is that the git history itself will be for the overall repository, so 
it will be tangled between the projects.  A commit to the Model Loader (for 
example) would show up if you're looking at Synapse's commit history and vice 
versa.

My first preference is whether we could work with the TSC to come up with a 
more agile process.  AAI is a microservice architecture with a number of common 
libraries - on that basis, I would think the decision on whether to create new 
ones (from a TSC) perspective shouldn't require the breadth of oversight it 
currently seeks.  Jimmy, you'll need to tell me how feasible that is.

That aside - the solution that's more in our hands, of course, is to shift to 
putting services and libraries into directories under a higher level git 
repository (or repositories).  Given the high degree of tangling that will 
surface in the git histories, I wonder if there's a "middle way".


Strawman: a modest level of git repositories which would each contain multiple 
microservices/libraries.  Perhaps something like...

  *   aai/data-management

     *   router-core
     *   data-router
     *   search-data-service

  *   aai/api

     *   gizmo
     *   resources
     *   traversal

  *   aai/applications

     *   aai-service (is this deprecated?)
     *   sparky-be
     *   sparky-fe

  *   aai/modelling

     *   babel
     *   model-loader

  *   aai/libraries

     *   aai-common
     *   aai-config
     *   aai-data
     *   champ
     *   logging-service
     *   rest-client
     *   test-config
Proposed repositories are the bolded aai/<functional> entries.

Obviously there's a fair amount of churn to do this - I'd say we would target 
post-Amsterdam, but (hopefully) it would be one-time.

Thoughts?

(Incidentally, I think this could complement Susan's suggestion that we put the 
auth library in gizmo for now, and reorganise later if a proposal like this one 
is adopted.


Cheers.


On 14 July 2017 at 12:03, Susan Bylsma 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Great idea, Jimmy.  We are about to need a place to put an auth library to 
support opening Gizmo.  Might be a good use case to test out an alternate 
approach?

From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 On Behalf Of FORSYTH, JAMES
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 11:50 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: MULLER, ANDREW <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; PRESSLEY, VIVIAN A 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] FW: [onap-tsc] [aai] YOUR ACTION IS REQUIRED: A&AI 
Project needs new repos for microservices

AAI team,

We have been approved for new repos for our new microservices and the champ 
library.

I assigned the following stories but I didn’t move them into the current sprint 
because I do not know if the repos will be available in time:

https://jira.onap.org/browse/AAI-26<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_AAI-2D26&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=Nlqn84LNgz18DQEWJUAs1-cWmJXDOlR21D-Sz3CbrkY&s=e9DZlFiHDg0dSZTGgtWRFkLqLfdpsFBNWxcPNYc0X6A&e=>
 (champ) Andrew Muller - I want to assign this to you but you still need to 
create your LF account
https://jira.onap.org/browse/AAI-27<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_AAI-2D27&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=Nlqn84LNgz18DQEWJUAs1-cWmJXDOlR21D-Sz3CbrkY&s=c45sxSxVK14E6xfT5VUtlVJkV3PfOMFPWUVlHtYUBVk&e=>
 (gizmo) CT Paterson I assigned this to you
https://jira.onap.org/browse/AAI-46<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_AAI-2D46&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=Nlqn84LNgz18DQEWJUAs1-cWmJXDOlR21D-Sz3CbrkY&s=fQpgofQrh5A17Z7HHZOpiUP8Jx1X0QDyybGsCPnG6FA&e=>
 (babel) Tian Lee this one is yours

Given that new repos require TSC approval and can require long lead times, I 
think we need to have a discussion about the merits of continuing to have a 
separate repo per microservice.  I believe that there are ways to accomplish 
separation across microservices contained in the same repo with regard to code 
review and packaging, and if so it probably makes sense to look at reducing 
rather than expanding the number of git repos that A&AI uses, or at a minimum 
to be content with the repos we have and develop a strategy for onboarding new 
microservices and libraries into existing repos.

So, A&AI team (and wider ONAP team members who have faces/solved similar 
issues) let’s discuss!

Thanks,
Jimmy
A&AI PTL

From: Gildas Lanilis [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 1:34 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: Kenny Paul <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
FORSYTH, JAMES <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: FW: [onap-tsc] YOUR ACTION IS REQUIRED: A&AI Project needs new repos 
for microservices

Hi Helpdesk,

We have obtained quorum from TSC voting members for supporting the request for 
AAI project (Jimmy PTL is cc’ed) asking to add 3 more repos (see below). See 
email thread available at 
https://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-tsc/2017-July/001139.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_pipermail_onap-2Dtsc_2017-2DJuly_001139.html&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=kYUtAQS02P5Md_yu6RPx1dZChDGJfhqEhfZrNcXwH3c&s=6wcBktsJ7Or9DHfCgM8XKaxHuxH2cZqO4P10bZobIZc&e=>

All associated artifacts are properly  documented in 
wiki<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Resources-2Band-2BRepositories-23ResourcesandRepositories-2DActiveandAvailableInventory&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=kYUtAQS02P5Md_yu6RPx1dZChDGJfhqEhfZrNcXwH3c&s=cX59Nf5SLYTIqOk_3r96nBrxiYOWgFlWsxMRU-6M6xI&e=>
 and are summarized in the screenshot below.

[cid:[email protected]]

Let us know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287<tel:(415)%20238-6287>

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 10:01 AM
To: Gildas Lanilis <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] YOUR ACTION IS REQUIRED: A&AI Project needs new repos 
for microservices

+1

Best
Jamil

Le 7 juil. 2017 à 00:27, Gildas Lanilis 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
Dear TSC Voting Members,

AAI team needs the 3 following repos to be added in Gerrit. The PTL (Jimmy 
Forsyth) has provided the rational down below.
At this point the request and all associated artifacts are properly  documented 
in 
wiki<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Resources-2Band-2BRepositories-23ResourcesandRepositories-2DActiveandAvailableInventory&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=kYUtAQS02P5Md_yu6RPx1dZChDGJfhqEhfZrNcXwH3c&s=cX59Nf5SLYTIqOk_3r96nBrxiYOWgFlWsxMRU-6M6xI&e=>
 and are summarized in the screenshot below.
<image002.jpg>

To expedite the approval, your approval by replying a +1, 0, -1 by email will 
be deemed sufficient by LF to move forward in repos creation.
The AA&I team thank you in advance for your prompt response.

Best Regards,
Gildas Lanilis
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287<tel:(415)%20238-6287>

From: FORSYTH, JAMES [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 7:06 AM
To: Gildas Lanilis
Subject: FW: [onap-tsc] A&AI Project needs new repos for microservices

Hi, Gildas,

I have made the update to the Resources and Repositories 
Page.<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Resources-2Band-2BRepositories-23ResourcesandRepositories-2DActiveandAvailableInventory&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=N0nd4_E6pXRddwrKlctvqfy2p7bRUuVh6P7FHpHYRAw&s=dqPvJ8JIEgW8zblQnYuXulM6smJETtxvHtDUuiYS7V0&e=>

Can you help with A&AI’s request to get new repos added?

Thank you!

-jimmy

From: Kenny Paul [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 7:48 AM
To: FORSYTH, JAMES <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; PAQUETTE, FRANCIS 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; WEATHERLY, 
STEPHEN <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; BYLSMA, SUSAN 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; DENING, EDWARD 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; BLIMKIE, STEVEN 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; AGGARWAL, 
MANISHA <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Gildas Lanilis 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] A&AI Project needs new repos for microservices

Hi James,
Please ensure that all of the necessary information for these have been 
provided on the Resources and Repositories 
Page.<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Resources-2Band-2BRepositories-23ResourcesandRepositories-2DActiveandAvailableInventory&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=N0nd4_E6pXRddwrKlctvqfy2p7bRUuVh6P7FHpHYRAw&s=dqPvJ8JIEgW8zblQnYuXulM6smJETtxvHtDUuiYS7V0&e=>
At first glance it appears that babel is missing.

Once that information is complete, please let Gildas know and he will help 
shepherd this request.

Best Regards,
-kenny

Kenny Paul,  Technical Program Manager
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
510.766.5945<tel:(510)%20766-5945>

On Jul 5, 2017, at 9:27 AM, FORSYTH, JAMES 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Dear ONAP TSC Members,

The A&AI team would like to request permission to add 3 new repositories for 2 
new microservices and a new graph database abstraction library for the 
Amsterdam release.

The repos will be called:

aai/champ
aai/gizmo
aai/babel

A&AI’s rationale for creating these separate repos as opposed to using a 
subdirectory under an existing repo is as follows: it is the convention to 
create a separate git repository for each microservice and library as is 
demonstrated by the microservices currently part of the AAI project. The 
advantages of separate repos (as opposed a single repo containing multiple 
microservices) is the ability to manage access rights for each microservice. 
Otherwise a user with write permissions to the “common” microservice repo could 
accidentally (or intentionally) make change to another microservice.

Please let me know if further clarification is needed.

Thank you for your attention,
Jimmy Forsyth
A&AI PTL


_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=N0nd4_E6pXRddwrKlctvqfy2p7bRUuVh6P7FHpHYRAw&s=nrf_db78BJ5q9lzkRyPA5FpPsbbhwcDONwdjE4yoU18&e=>

_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Dtsc&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=kYUtAQS02P5Md_yu6RPx1dZChDGJfhqEhfZrNcXwH3c&s=arxzLAHCNfUX5X35ta8idvusrnzdKdPzKZIjJX6CnJw&e=>

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at 
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=Nlqn84LNgz18DQEWJUAs1-cWmJXDOlR21D-Sz3CbrkY&s=hDu6Fk8gO9qZmE7jUi90TTY_dtuiya2Dg8F5CQinPoQ&e=>

_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=Oej6QUk5p2KdqNEWySpOHA&m=Nlqn84LNgz18DQEWJUAs1-cWmJXDOlR21D-Sz3CbrkY&s=VIJFmsc5ntO2zAbkA6gFjwGyTrs_g5aRL51AKyX-KS8&e=>

_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to