Can we also have a discussion about the workflow designer (which should be part of SDC), its capabilities, proposed architecture etc.?
Zahi Kapeluto Lead Architect, Network Communications LOB AT&T Network Applications Development · SD&E Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey | Chicago ················································· Mobile: +972 (54) 6636831 Office: +972 (3) 9280064 From: <[email protected]> on behalf of "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 12:46 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [onap-discuss] About workflow engine Hi seshu and guys About the workflow engine(WFE) usage, I have an idea and want to share in the community, If I am wrong, please correct me. In the SO or controllers projects of ONAP, there are many opensource party workflow engines, such as Camunda, MSO, DG, aria tosca workflow engine, ...etc. Most of those workflow engines now bind to the project. Workflow engines self are independant fucntion and can be decoupled with the specific project logic functions. Could the projects make them as micro service? If some projects use the same one, the WFE instance could be shared among them. If possible, we can create an group or wiki page to discuss the issue. Thanks all. Best Regards Maopeng _______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
