I would like to focus our discussion on design-time change management workflows (e.g., pause, upgrade etc.) and how current tooling fits into the overall SDC architecture and UX.
Can I set a meeting for next Tuesday, 17:00 UTC+3? Zahi Kapeluto Lead Architect, Network Communications LOB AT&T Network Applications Development · SD&E Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey | Chicago ················································· Mobile: +972 (54) 6636831 Office: +972 (3) 9280064 From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 4:54 To: ZAHI KAPELUTO <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "SACKS, ZOHAR" <[email protected]> Subject: 答复: Re: [onap-discuss] About workflow engine Hi Zahi Yes, definite. Workflow engines have different workflow templates. If the workflow is designed by user via SDC, it will effect SDC. In my mind, some workflow is used by user, maybe some workflow is used only by the code developer as well, such as Camunda offline tools, DG offline tools,.... However if the workflow design for user can be integrated with SDC via portal SDK, It will be greater. Best Regards Maopeng 原始邮件 发件人： <[email protected]>; 收件人：张茂鹏10030173; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; 抄送人： <[email protected]>; 日 期 ：2017年07月20日 02:27 主 题 ：Re: [onap-discuss] About workflow engine Can we also have a discussion about the workflow designer (which should be part of SDC), its capabilities, proposed architecture etc.? Zahi Kapeluto Lead Architect, Network Communications LOB AT&T Network Applications Development · SD&E Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey | Chicago ················································· Mobile: +972 (54) 6636831 Office: +972 (3) 9280064 From: <[email protected]> on behalf of "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 12:46 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [onap-discuss] About workflow engine Hi seshu and guys About the workflow engine(WFE) usage, I have an idea and want to share in the community, If I am wrong, please correct me. In the SO or controllers projects of ONAP, there are many opensource party workflow engines, such as Camunda, MSO, DG, aria tosca workflow engine, ...etc. Most of those workflow engines now bind to the project. Workflow engines self are independant fucntion and can be decoupled with the specific project logic functions. Could the projects make them as micro service? If some projects use the same one, the WFE instance could be shared among them. If possible, we can create an group or wiki page to discuss the issue. Thanks all. Best Regards Maopeng _______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
