Hi Brian, the NFVI telemetry is being driven out of the multi-vim/cloud project 
such that is abstracts across any cloud platform provider. We’ve been working 
with DCAE/VES teams towards an approach, including data model and VES 
extensions that would stripe across the physical and virtual resource 
allocations and utilization. Further to Maryam’s presentation, we are currently 
working with her and the VES team to explore the fit.

Thanks,
-Sumit

From: <onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> on behalf of Brian Hedstrom 
<brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com>
Date: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 8:27 AM
To: "Tahhan, Maryam" <maryam.tah...@intel.com>
Cc: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-dicuss][dcae] Platform Service Assurance.

Hi Maryam,
Thank you for providing the slides you presented during last week's DCAE 
project meeting.
While your presentation is focused on the bigger picture of Service Assurance 
for NFV/SDN, is your proposal for ONAP specific to Resource Data Collection and 
Distribution using CollectD?

Thanks
Brian

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Tahhan, Maryam 
<maryam.tah...@intel.com<mailto:maryam.tah...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hi folks
Thank you very much for your time last week. Please find attached the 
presentation on NFVI telemetry.

My questions to the community:
- Does NFVI telemetry fit into DCAE?
- What is going to provision collectors like VES in ONAP today?
- What will manage the physical infrastructure in ONAP? Is that a better fit 
for collectd?
- Will a collector control plane API be defined for DCAE?

In OPNFV the collector (collectd) is currently places on compute nodes through 
the installer. Is this something that fits into the ONAP view of the world? Is 
there some other way we should be looking at landing the NFVI collector on the 
platform (it's assumed to be part of the underlying infrastructure) and if so, 
what about the NFVI collector control plane (being able to modify/configure the 
collector based on environment conditions/workloads) should this be integrated 
with the dcae controller?

BR
Maryam

_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwMFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=3nVF4lkCrih5WqBdByLDuw&m=GtXzE_q5ALu9VXsxQgY9rTs2Sljv4W2Vt4tiRr7JYtY&s=8Qtaaq0BM4ao00Sn38O1uEaFCV97jF0kXzWInsiflFI&e=>



--
Brian Hedstrom
Founder/CEO
OAM Technology Consulting LLC
oamtechnologyconsulting.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__oamtechnologyconsulting.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=3nVF4lkCrih5WqBdByLDuw&m=GtXzE_q5ALu9VXsxQgY9rTs2Sljv4W2Vt4tiRr7JYtY&s=ZV1qv61cDWT3FPNjdE24b-wKvH1QPWlKtc3D2rWjzvY&e=>
brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com<mailto:brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com>
720-470-7091
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to