Hi Alex,

Multiple projects feels that we need to decide which path we are going to take 
since there are two different IM candidates on the table

Thanks

DENG Hui


From: Vul, Alex [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 11:36 PM
To: denghui (L) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; onap-tsc 
<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] [sdc][so][vfc][modeling]Concensus of SDC modeling on 
VoLTE use case

Hi,

Can you elaborate on what #4 means?

Thanks,

Alex Vul
Intel Corporation


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 8:34 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; onap-tsc 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [onap-tsc] [sdc][so][vfc][modeling]Concensus of SDC modeling on VoLTE 
use case

Hello all

After 3 days continuous teleconf during modeling subcommittee, we finally made 
concensus on this. Thanks everybody.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+meetings

1) SDC team will start to support service composition from R2
2) agree the hack solution, SDC will confirm it in 3 hours
3) ZTE will propose tosca based SD-WAN solution to SDC for review and will also 
coordinate with SDNC project.
4) modeling committee will start to work on IM and DM as soon as possible

Best regards,

DENG Hui

_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to