Hi Catherine,

Thanks for your help. I've ever tried the *-release jjb but they all failed for unknown reasons. 

Gary says that the *-release jobs are defined by AT&T especially for the components from ecomp and he doesn't know how to fix the problem either.

Regards,
Guangrong

发自我的iPhone
On 08/21/2017 18:31, Lefevre, Catherine wrote:

Good morning Guangrong,

 

Did you look at the similar discussion thread - [onap-discuss] [ci-management][cli] How to trigger Sonar from jenkins job?

https://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-discuss/2017-August/002980.html

 

Best regards

catherine

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 8:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [onap-discuss] [integration][holmes] How to Set up a Sonar Inspection Job to the CI Workflow

 

Hi there,

 

This is the third time I reach out for help. Hope that someone from the integration team could help to provide some guidance.

 

Thanks.

 

BR

Guangrong

 

 

 

 

原始邮件

发件人:付光荣10144542

收件人: <[email protected]>;

20170818 08:58

[onap-discuss] [integration][holmes] How to Set up a Sonar Inspection Job to the CI Workflow

 

Hi,

 

Anyone help to give us a guidance on this? We finised part of our UT codes but we don't know the exact coverage due to the lack of Sonar jobs.

 

Guangrong

 

 

 

 

 

 

发件人:付光荣10144542

收件人: <[email protected]>;

20170814 14:07

[integration][holmes] How to Set up a Sonar Inspection Jobj to the CI Workflow

 

Hi there,

 

I've set up a series of Jenkins Jobs for Holmes. All of them seem to be running as expected. But still we could not find the Holmes related UT coverage in the Dashboard of ONAP Sonar.  The *-release-version-java-daily jobs have been removed from the workflow because it caused unknown errors and even Gary has no idea on how to fix them. Does it has something to do with the UT coverage?

 

Thanks and Regards,

Guangrong

 

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to