Thanks Marco. We have powered up ONAP ( - dcae ) on Vanila openstack (
after bit of a struggle ).

We also learnt that dcae 1.1.0 will work on vanilla openstack. So can we
assume we cannot demo vLB in 1.0.0 + Vanilla openstack ?

BR,
Viswa

<http://www.verizon.com>

Viswanath Kumar Skand Priya
Architect
SDN, Cloud Services & Orchestration


On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:52 PM, PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Viswa,
>
>
>
> Not really. The onboarding process (SDC + demo.sh in the robot VM)
> populates ONAP components with metadata about the VNF that you want to run.
> Those steps are required for the closed loop to work correctly.
>
>
>
> Also, regarding the vLB, we are testing it for ONAP 1.1.0 but we still
> have some issue with the DNS scaling scenario. So, for the scaling use case
> you may want to see what we did for ONAP 1.0.0.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marco
>
>
>
> *From: *<[email protected]> on behalf of "Kumar Skand
> Priya, Viswanath V via onap-discuss" <[email protected]>
> *Reply-To: *"Kumar Skand Priya, Viswanath V" <viswanath.kumarskandpriya@
> verizon.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 11:03 AM
> *To: *"DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" <[email protected]>
>
> *Cc: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: [onap-discuss] [E] Re: Closed Loop Question
>
>
>
> Thanks Pam. I shall try vDNS as suggested.
>
>
>
> BTW Is there a way we can skip the SDC on-boarding steps and directly
> start with deployment + scaling ??
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Viswa
>
>
>
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.verizon.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=TYE6HdAJosx0j0ckbJqHiItzrnuMkRAUm07SzHz8D2I&s=LpqXsu4ntmHCIYVij_-YymkSfIcd5cFARh8byEN2GhE&e=>
>
>
>
> Viswanath Kumar Skand Priya
>
> Architect
>
> SDN, Cloud Services & Orchestration
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:26 PM, DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Viswa,
>
>
>
> The vDNS (also call vLB) use case does VNF scaling. It is very basic. J
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Pam
>
>
>
> *From: *<[email protected]> on behalf of "Kumar Skand
> Priya, Viswanath V via onap-discuss" <[email protected]>
> *Reply-To: *"Kumar Skand Priya, Viswanath V" <viswanath.kumarskandpriya@
> verizon.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, August 22, 2017 at 10:45 AM
> *To: *Josef Reisinger <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: [onap-discuss] [E] Re: Closed Loop Question
>
>
>
> Hi Josef,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the note. Does this mean that, currently we cannot use ONAP to
> perform scaling / healing of VNFs ?
>
>
>
> Could you let me know if there are any other demo available today, which
> takes use through closed loop?
>
>
>
> Can the CLAMP project be leveraged to demonstrate closed loop?
>
>
>
> PS : Bharath works with me on ONAP exploration!
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Viswa
>
>
>
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.verizon.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=jwTiArcEj6aUX0HjV0M3dT12gUtk7rC07xpgpVZkS_4&m=qWoY_xw3Vs-N_sofCThrKlfCYjsUSL8K4gQOA9zK_Ls&s=_r9QB-B4NklThucc4VpdnK8UStN6nHFgoPD6JgKAioI&e=>
>
>
>
> Viswanath Kumar Skand Priya
>
> Architect
>
> SDN, Cloud Services & Orchestration
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Josef Reisinger <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> I run the basic vFW demo right now and this does not include scaling of
> the VMs. It includes changing the package rate of the package generator
> (keeping it constant). To change the packet rate, there is a REST API.
> Not sure I got your Q'#2 right, the closes "loop" consists of the vFW as
> the source of measurements, DCAE to process the measurements and CDAP to
> run an APP die determine whether the packet rate it too high, Policy & APPC
> to close the loop (roughly, see more details here:
> https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Tutorial%3A+Verifying+and+
> Observing+a+deployed+Service+Instance
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Tutorial-253A-2BVerifying-2Band-2BObserving-2Ba-2Bdeployed-2BService-2BInstance&d=DwMFAw&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=9F3pNUkzjE-2v1eTClkRVTaKybM-QdOEEflZQ1UA1C3bK3Y3fLmJGlCViaBBmZar&m=vEBN4n4tgbnL2721l_9VHKSP7C0UejdO-PkR8ypFO4c&s=XiryG8oNDAXcn3WUE1emsISKDJ6_O5XXWcG2CER92bY&e=>
> )
>
> The vFW VMs have different # of network interfaces, three for the sink &
> pgn nodes, 4 for the firewall node. Running vFW demo on another openstack
> instance can become a bit tricky maybe, I am not sure the the entire comms
> runs via the "public" network. If you run into issues, you should keep that
> as a probable cause of issues in mind.
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
> *Josef Reisinger*
>
>
>
> From:        bharath thiruveedula <[email protected]>
> To:        Josef Reisinger <[email protected]>
> Date:        22.08.2017 10:23
> Subject:        Closed Loop Question
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> Hi Josef,
>
> I think you played well with DCAE part :)
>
> I am currently looking to make closed loop work with vFW. I have few
> questions on this:
> 1)Can we scale up/down the VNFs in vFW demo using some rest apis.
> 2)Can we scale using just policy VM and MSO VM?
> 3) What are the minimum network interfaces we need to attach vFW VMs as I
> am launching vFW in different openstack and ONAP is running in different
> openstack?
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated Josef!
>
> Best Regards
> Bharath T
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> onap-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.
> onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=
> udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=9F3pNUkzjE-2v1eTClkRVTaKybM-
> QdOEEflZQ1UA1C3bK3Y3fLmJGlCViaBBmZar&m=vEBN4n4tgbnL2721l_
> 9VHKSP7C0UejdO-PkR8ypFO4c&s=ZZ06_-do3YUwE1DVwDknqx8OstUn8nxUaCbF1NdMGdc&e=
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
  • Re: [onap-discuss] [E] Re:... Kumar Skand Priya, Viswanath V via onap-discuss

Reply via email to