It was agree before and I do not understand why we need to open it again and again.
R1 will not be ready on time. Best regards Tal Halfon Development Manager @ Amdocs P. +972 54 2213763 [cid:image001.png@01D2DC45.AD6F91B0] [ONAP_logo_Sig] From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 2:32 PM To: Halfon Tal <halfon....@amdocs.com>; Gaoweitao (Victor, MANO) <victor....@huawei.com>; SHADMI, DAVID <ds2...@att.com> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Tali Orenbach <tali.orenb...@amdocs.com> Subject: RE: [sdc][vnfsdk] CSAR for R1 discussion I recalled that it was presented during the joint meeting between modeling subcommittee and SDC, the conclusion was that this package definition was not agreed by VNF SDK, please bring it back to VNF SDK for discussion. Thanks DENG Hui From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Halfon Tal Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 6:58 PM To: Gaoweitao (Victor, MANO) <victor....@huawei.com<mailto:victor....@huawei.com>>; SHADMI, DAVID <ds2...@att.com<mailto:ds2...@att.com>> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Tali Orenbach <tali.orenb...@amdocs.com<mailto:tali.orenb...@amdocs.com>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [sdc][vnfsdk] CSAR for R1 discussion Hi It was discuses two weeks ago I am attaching the presentation The only change is that after the discussion in Friday we need to support the metadata. Remember we have less than 3 weeks to finish development. Best regards Tal Halfon Development Manager @ Amdocs P. +972 54 2213763 [cid:image001.png@01D2DC45.AD6F91B0] [ONAP_logo_Sig] From: Gaoweitao (Victor, MANO) [mailto:victor....@huawei.com] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 1:47 PM To: Halfon Tal <halfon....@amdocs.com<mailto:halfon....@amdocs.com>>; SHADMI, DAVID <ds2...@att.com<mailto:ds2...@att.com>> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Tali Orenbach <tali.orenb...@amdocs.com<mailto:tali.orenb...@amdocs.com>> Subject: 答复: [sdc][vnfsdk] CSAR for R1 discussion Hi Tal, Thanks for your information. I’m not sure when SDC discuss the VNF CSAR format? Can you give us more detail about this? Cause this also related VNFSDK and VFC, I would suggest VNFSDK and VFC developer also involve this. BR Victor ************************************************************************************************* 本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使 用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通 知发件人并删除本邮件！ ************************************************************************************************* ************************************************************************************************* This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! ************************************************************************************************* 发件人: Halfon Tal [mailto:halfon....@amdocs.com] 发送时间: 2017年8月28日 18:35 收件人: Gaoweitao (Victor, MANO) <victor....@huawei.com<mailto:victor....@huawei.com>>; SHADMI, DAVID <ds2...@att.com<mailto:ds2...@att.com>> 抄送: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Tali Orenbach <tali.orenb...@amdocs.com<mailto:tali.orenb...@amdocs.com>> 主题: RE: [sdc][vnfsdk] CSAR for R1 discussion Hi The only change is to support the TOSCA-Metadata( Bad practice ) The CSAR package for R1 need to be like that. This was agree already - MainServiceTemplate.mf - MainServiceTemplate.yaml - / TOSCA-Metadata o Tosca.meta - /Artifacts o install.sh o /Files - /Definitions o GlobalSubstitutionTypesServiceTemplate.yaml - /Licenses Best regards Tal Halfon Development Manager @ Amdocs P. +972 54 2213763 [cid:image001.png@01D2DC45.AD6F91B0] [ONAP_logo_Sig] From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Gaoweitao (Victor, MANO) Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 1:08 PM To: SHADMI, DAVID <ds2...@att.com<mailto:ds2...@att.com>> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-discuss] [sdc][vnfsdk] CSAR for R1 discussion Hi David, As we discussed last Friday in VNFSDK weekly meeting, recommendation from the call is to support Option 1(with metadata) for R1 and continue discussions around what will be used for R2+. Could we discuss the composition of CSAR package in today’s SDC meeting? Attachment is the suggestion for the CSAR package. BR Victor ************************************************************************************************* 本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使 用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通 知发件人并删除本邮件！ ************************************************************************************************* ************************************************************************************************* This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! ************************************************************************************************* This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer <https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
