Hi Dan and Liza,

Please make sure that both Zhuoyao-ZTE and Patric-Huawei are presented at the followup call.

Thanks,
Lingli


China Mobile Research Institute
2017年08月29日 19:09li.z...@zte.com.cn 写道:

Hi Dan,


Replies sees below.


Thanks,

LiZi




原始邮件
发件人: <dt5...@att.com>;
收件人:李滋00164331; <ram...@huawei.com>; <kaly...@huawei.com>;黄卓垚10112215; <jf2...@att.com>;
抄送人: <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>;
日 期 :2017年08月29日 02:54
主 题 :Re: [aai][sdnc] The sdnc schema and Thirdparty-sdnc schema in A&AI


LiZi,

 

The current SDN-C design would just use a properties file to map the URL, credentials, etc for one specific instance of a third party SDN controller.  f I understand this correctly, it looks like this model allows for multiple addresses  for a particular third party SDN controller, which is clearly a good thing but does introduce new complexities.

LiZi: According to the requirement there need a container to store the generic-address node, actually, there will be only one address for a thirdparty SDN Controller.

 

For Amsterdam, can we make a simplifying assumption that there will be only one instance of each third party SDN controller?    If so, then it should be fairly straightforward I think for SDN-C to convert over to using ESR to retrieve the  URL and credentials of the third party SDN controller.  There are still some details to be worked, like where we’d get the third-party-sdn-id (I’m guessing from TOSCA?), but that should be manageable.

LiZi: Yes, For Amsterdam, there will be only one instance for each third party SDN controller. As discussed with Zhuoyao, We have two ways to connect WAN with third party SDN controller. If I am misunderstand anything please correct me.


        1. connect at design time, In SDC there is a way to input Service-type, for the value we can input vendor to this property. For Amsterdam, we assume that there will be one controller for each vendor. And then, create a relationship between WAN controller with thirdparty-sdnc while initial the WAN controller.


        2. connect at runtime, when initial the WAN at runtime, user can query all the registered thirdparty-sdnc and select one to bind with WAN controller with lifecycle management portal. This way we need to discuss with the Usecase UI team.

 Since there is less than two weeks for us before the code freeze deadline. So personaly I suggest we take the aproach 1 for Amsterdam release.


If not, then I think there are a few questions/issues we’ll need to resolve to determine how to select the correct third party SDN-C URL and credentials:

 

  1. Is location truly just “Core” or “Edge”, or could it be geographic?  In other words, do we need to take geography into account when querying for a third party controller?

    LiZi: For Amsterdam release, there will be only one type of thirdparty sdn controller for one network, so temporarily in R1, the location will just “Core” or “Edge”. But infuture it could be geographic. Am I correct? @Zhuoyao

  2. Each thirdparty-sdnc-info record seems like it can have multiple generic-addresses, but I don’t see a field that tells indicates whether load should be distributed evenly (round-robin)  across instances, or if the list is to be treated as priority order (primary, secondary, tertiary, etc).  Is that because for Amsterdam, we are assuming always one mode of distribution?

    LiZi: Actually, there will be only one generic-address for each thirdparty-sdnc-info, for A&AI schema, there need a container to nest a node.

 

Would it be acceptable to assume only one instance of each third party SDN controller for Amsterdam?

LiZi: Totally, I agree with you.

 

Separate but related question – the SDN-C developers asked me if I could set up a review of the VoLTE transaction flow for them.  Would you be the right person to help us with that, and if so, can we set up a call in the next day or so  to do that?

 LiZi: I agree, I think we need a meeting to discuss these issues. If there is a meeting I will join, I can share what I know and what I am thinking of, but I don't think I can be the leading role. :-)


Thanks!
Dan

 

Dan Timoney

Principal Technical Staff Member

AT&T

Email : dtimo...@att.com

Office : +1 (732) 420-3226

Mobile : +1 (201) 960-1211

200 S Laurel Ave, Rm E2-2A03

Middletown, NJ 08873

 

From: "li.z...@zte.com.cn" <li.z...@zte.com.cn>
Date: Monday, August 28, 2017 at 8:09 AM
To: "ram...@huawei.com" <ram...@huawei.com>, "kaly...@huawei.com" <kaly...@huawei.com>, "huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn" <huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn>, "TIMONEY, DAN" <dt5...@att.com>
Cc: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [aai][sdnc] The sdnc schema and Thirdparty-sdnc schema in A&AI

 

Dear SDNC Team,

 

According to the feedback from YangXu/Zuoyao and Ramu. The thirdparty SDNC which will registered to AAI/ESR. The schema sees bellow. 

But maybe there is some relationship between the thirdparty-SDNC and the original SDNC schema or other system. Maybe pnf ? pe?  For example there may be a relationship from thirdparty-sdnc-info  to pnf and the label is "owns".

Anybody from SDNC team can confirm this issue?

 

The attachment is the draft about whole schema of external system.

 

Thanks,

LiZi

 

thirdparty-sdnc-info







thirdparty-sdnc-id

String

M

Unique ID of third party sdnc item.

xml-key


location

String

O

such as Core or Edge



protocal

String

O

protocal of third party SDNC, for example netconf/snmp.



product-name

String

O




generic-addresses

ArrayList

M




resourceVersion

String


used by A&AI repository



relationship-list

ArrayList


used by A&AI repository


 

generic-address







generic-address-id

String

M


xml-key


system-name

String

M




vendor

String

M




version

String

M




type

String

M




url

String

M




username

String

M




password

String

M




system-statu

String

M




system-type

String

M

vim/vnfm/sdnc/ems-resource/ems-performance/ems-alarm

xml-key


resourceVersion

String

O

used by A&AI repository



relationship-list

ArrayList

O

used by A&AI repository


 

 

 

 



_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to