Team, I have made the changes described below and uploaded the deck to the vCPE use case "drafts for discussion" page: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Residential+Broadband+vCPE+Drafts+for+discussion?focusedCommentId=15992837&refresh=1504629237289#comment-15992837 Please comment. Thanks, Gil
_____________________________________________ From: BULLARD, GIL Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 3:54 PM To: 'Kang Xi' <kang...@huawei.com>; 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; DAUGHERTY, ROBERT E <rd4...@att.com>; KLUGER, YOAV <yoav.klu...@amdocs.com>; TIMONEY, DAN <dt5...@att.com>; CHOMA, JOHN S <jc1...@att.com>; SHAH, SARYU D <ss3...@att.com>; MOHAPATRA, SANJEETA <sm1...@att.com>; MONTELEONE, CHRISTINA <cm3...@att.com> Cc: ZINNIKAS, MICHAEL J <mz2...@att.com> Subject: RE: [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion Importance: High Team, I talked with Yoav who had some good suggestions on how to minimize the departure from "reality" with the introduction of the Allotted Resource model for a BRG and solve the A&AI problem I mentioned before. I won't get a chance to update my slides before I leave for vacation, but here are the highlights of the changes: 1) Slide 4, the vCpeResCust model, remains as I have shown it on the most recent deck on the wiki link below. 2) Slide 40, however, will change in the following ways: a. In the Release 1 "Alt" flow, SDNC will continue to create a PNF object in A&AI as I had showed before. However, this PNF object will not be associated with the vCpeResCust service, nor will it appear in the vCpeResCust service model (hence no changes to slide 4). Nor will it in fact be associated with any Service object in Release 1. SDNC will continue to write both the MAC Address and WAN IP to this PNF object. b. I found out the A&AI PNF object doesn't have a MAC Address attribute. Nor does the P-Interface object. Only the L-Interface object has a MAC Address. This seems strange to Yoav and I since for a PNF the MAC Address it seems really should be associated with a P-Interface, and not only with an L-Interface. i. Christina, can we get A&AI to add MAC Address to P-Interface? c. SDNC will search A&AI for BRGs by searching for PNFs such that that MAC Address appears on a P-Interface of that PNF. i. Christina, can we get A&AI to support such a search in R1? 3) Slide 45 will change in the following ways: a. SO will pass the BRG_WAN_MAC_Address to SDNC with the "Assign" for the BRG Allotted Resource. b. As part of "Assign" processing for the BRG AR, SDNC will search A&AI by MAC Address for the BRG PNF with that MAC address (see query above). SDNC will obtain the WAN IP from the associated PNF. In effect, SDNC will be treating the A&AI PNF object as the "pool" from which to assign the WAN IP for that Allotted Resource object. c. Yoav makes a good point that, for an Allotted Resource that consumes an entire VNF (as in this case), the Allotted Resource doesn't really need to be "created"; rather it pre-exists with the VNF instantiation. He suggests therefore that the "Create" operation on the AR be a "no-op" and the "Activate" operation be what drives the configuration of the vBRG_EMU VNF. i. John C, Dan T, do you agree? ii. Dan T, for an Allotted Resource that consumes the entire VNF, should the WAN IP that is used to configure that Allotted Resource be modeled on the (parent) VNF object or the Allotted Resource object, or both? Depending on the answer here, perhaps in "3b" above SDNC should also update the WAN IP on the corresponding vBRG_EMU VNF object? Yoav, please feel free to add anything that I might have missed. I will update the slides to reflect these changes on Tuesday when I return. Have a great weekend all! Gil _____________________________________________ From: BULLARD, GIL Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 1:05 PM To: 'Kang Xi' <kang...@huawei.com<mailto:kang...@huawei.com>>; 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; DAUGHERTY, ROBERT E <rd4...@att.com<mailto:rd4...@att.com>>; KLUGER, YOAV <yoav.klu...@amdocs.com<mailto:yoav.klu...@amdocs.com>> Cc: ZINNIKAS, MICHAEL J <mz2...@att.com<mailto:mz2...@att.com>> Subject: RE: [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion Team, I made some updates that result in the BRG Allotted Resource Resource-Level flow looking like the TunnelXConn Allotte Resource Resource-Level flow, which is appropriate and necessary in fact. I also updated the BRG_EMU Service-Level flow to clarify that now Robot must remember the BRG_EMU Service Instance UUID for its use when wearing the "Homing Emulator" hat. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Residential+Broadband+vCPE+Drafts+for+discussion?refresh=1504129602127&focusedCommentId=15991828&refresh=1504196505842#comment-15991828 FYI, Gil _____________________________________________ From: BULLARD, GIL Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 5:49 PM To: 'Kang Xi' <kang...@huawei.com<mailto:kang...@huawei.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; DAUGHERTY, ROBERT E <rd4...@att.com<mailto:rd4...@att.com>>; KLUGER, YOAV <yoav.klu...@amdocs.com<mailto:yoav.klu...@amdocs.com>> Cc: ZINNIKAS, MICHAEL J <mz2...@att.com<mailto:mz2...@att.com>> Subject: RE: [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion Team, I have updated the slides based upon the feedback today that modeling of BRG as a PNF will not be viable from an SO perspective in R1. I have thus changed it to an Allotted Resource. The updated slides can be found here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Residential+Broadband+vCPE+Drafts+for+discussion?focusedCommentId=15991633&refresh=1504129602127#comment-15991633 Comments are appreciated. One issue we need to work is exactly which object SDNC will update in A&AI as part of the BRG Event processing flow, and what will the event look like that is intercepted by ROBOT. We need to verify that Robot will be able to correlate this event. I believe that this can be done because the event will have the BRG_EMU VNF UUID on it. Thanks, Gil -----Original Appointment----- From: Kang Xi [mailto:kang...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 10:44 AM To: Kang Xi; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; DAUGHERTY, ROBERT E; BULLARD, GIL; KLUGER, YOAV Subject: [integration][so] vCPE workflow discussion When: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 1:30 PM-3:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: https://zoom.us/j/4466668888
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
