@Stephen,

Thanks.

@Helen,
@Yang,

Could this be arranged as soon as possible?  We are blocked by this currently.  
Any project needs Ocata for R1?

Thanks,
Lusheng


From: "Gooch, Stephen" <stephen.go...@windriver.com>
Date: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 5:54 PM
To: "JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG)" <l...@research.att.com>, "Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed 
Network)" <yang....@huawei.com>, Yunxia Chen <helen.c...@huawei.com>
Cc: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Integration][OpenLabs] Keystone API version 
incompatible

To support Keystone v2, Ocata will also need to be removed from release 1 
support list.    Is there an integration call scheduled to discuss this topic 
and the effects that may waterfall from it?

Br,
- Stephen

From: JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG) [mailto:l...@research.att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 17:31
To: Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network); Yunxia Chen; Gooch, Stephen
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Integration][OpenLabs] Keystone API version 
incompatible

That is the setup in our other testing labs too, both v2.0 and v3 are 
supported.  The new developer’s lab only supports v3.
We will move to v3 too.  But with R1 timeline it will be very difficult.

Thanks,
Lusheng


From: "Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network)" 
<yang....@huawei.com<mailto:yang....@huawei.com>>
Date: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 5:04 PM
To: Yunxia Chen <helen.c...@huawei.com<mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>, "Gooch, 
Stephen" <stephen.go...@windriver.com<mailto:stephen.go...@windriver.com>>, 
"JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG)" <l...@research.att.com<mailto:l...@research.att.com>>
Cc: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Integration][OpenLabs] Keystone API version 
incompatible

In WindRiver Mitaka, even though the identity end point is v3, we used v2 to do 
the testing. Also Mitaka provides two versions of Openstack RC file, one is 
them uses identity v2.

Thanks,
-Yang

From: Yunxia Chen
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 4:01 PM
To: Gooch, Stephen; JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG); Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network)
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Integration][OpenLabs] Keystone API version 
incompatible

We got the same issue two months back when we deployed it at another lab, which 
is Mitaka.
Yang, do you remember what’s the solution or the workaround?

Regards,

Helen Chen

From: 
<onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>>
 on behalf of "Gooch, Stephen" 
<stephen.go...@windriver.com<mailto:stephen.go...@windriver.com>>
Date: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 12:55 PM
To: "JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG)" 
<l...@research.att.com<mailto:l...@research.att.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Integration][OpenLabs] Keystone API version 
incompatible

Hello,

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251530/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__review.openstack.org_-23_c_251530_&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=qiKb3LQBLje9oy8MjG3MEx1ia4mIocif7RoUY8WQWV8&m=8HocSPkvRgRBGsnb4A7GvOnCk7qeKaeNJQDH7gg7XYk&s=CSyNu34UsRGj-ZdLLRM58rz_UvO04WpoWLXLe7iAWG8&e=>
  Keystone v2.0 was deprecated after Open Stack Liberty.     I am assuming the 
Cloudify plugin was previously tested on Kilo or Liberty?

Br,
- Stephen

From: JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG) [mailto:l...@research.att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 15:16
To: Gooch, Stephen
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [Integration][OpenLabs] Keystone API version incompatible

Stephen,

Thanks for providing access to the lab.  We have been trying to bring up 
DACEGEN2 platform inside the WindRiver ONAP developer lab and encountered a 
problem.

The version of the Cloudify OpenStack plugin that DACEGEN2 uses is not 
compatible with the Identity API that is current provided by the tenant for 
DCAE, which is v3.  The compatible Identity API version is v2.0.  For example 
https://${hostname}:5000/v2.0<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__-24-257bhostname-257d-3A5000_v2.0&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=qiKb3LQBLje9oy8MjG3MEx1ia4mIocif7RoUY8WQWV8&m=8HocSPkvRgRBGsnb4A7GvOnCk7qeKaeNJQDH7gg7XYk&s=qrSDXOAARfqhjJ37R6Tcd4MKGFBLDEB90zLfzByJISY&e=>.
Can the v2.0 Identity API be added?

I created a Jira ticket for tracking this:  
https://jira.onap.org/browse/OPENLABS-43<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_OPENLABS-2D43&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=qiKb3LQBLje9oy8MjG3MEx1ia4mIocif7RoUY8WQWV8&m=8HocSPkvRgRBGsnb4A7GvOnCk7qeKaeNJQDH7gg7XYk&s=1yHxDG52r-QN2Qha5VZ0cKmdNHtvakHv7d8GAy1fTS8&e=>

Thanks,

Lusheng Ji
DCAE PTL

_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to