Alex, we have already heard yesterday feedback from Chris Donley Andy, VNFSDK & Architecture, , and now we need to move on and would expect more from the implementers side.
Thanks DENG Hui From: Vul, Alex [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 9:45 AM To: denghui (L) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; onap-tsc <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling subcommittee F2F Cont. on Wednesday Hi, I don't see how we the critical mass to do this. If you want the feedback to be heard, you need to include the people who are working on the VNF models, including those who are leading the work - Chris, Andy, others. Chris is on stage presenting. Andy is asleep... My two cents, Alex From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of denghui (L) Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 12:32 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; onap-tsc <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling subcommittee F2F Cont. on Wednesday Hello all We haven't finished yesterday session, let's continue 10:30-11:30 this morning in the meeting room (Algebre), 2nd floor. Agenda would be : 1) SDC feedback to VNF modeling 2) VFC feedback to VNF modeling 3) Summary of VNF Modeling 4) OSM modeling comparison Apologies to US remote attendees, we couldn't conflict with TSC meeting in the afternoon. Thanks a lot for your attending Best regards, DENG Hui
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
