Hi David, Jimmy, and Andy, Kevin
please confirm some questions below about the ECOMP Model document.
1. about the class Figure 2 ONAP Service Components
@ Andy Mayer @ Kevin Scaggs
1.1. why does serviceComponentInstance and ResourceInstances use
reference, but the ServiceInstance uses ComposedOf?
1.2. Could we unify term among the catalogItem, specification and
description in the left blocks of the diagram?
Suggest: In the design time, use package represents all files of
service; use Description represent the service templete or specification.
2. about the clase figure 3 ONAP Service Characteristics
2.1. @ Jimmy Forsyth David Shadmi @ Andy Mayer @ Kevin Scaggs
is the AAI and SDC align to the diagram above? If not, does the model need to
be changed?
2.2. @Andy Mayer @ Kevin ScaggsServiceDesc's attributes are directly
definited, not using the method above. Please confirm it.
2.3. @ Andy Mayer @ Kevin Scaggs in the diagram above, there is no
ServiceCatalogItemType, but in the document it exits.
ServiceNetworkAssociation and serviceRecipe are the same question.
Please
confirm them and update the diagram if needed.
BR
Maopeng
原始邮件
发件人：张茂鹏10030173
收件人： <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
抄送人： <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>;
日 期 ：2017年11月14日 19:39
主 题 ：Update the ONAP R2+ Service IM Discussion Page, please concern the
issues, thanks
Hi David, Jimmy, and Andy
I update the wiki page:
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16004631.
The issues with the name of yours is updated. Please help me to confirm with
them. If the your name related the issue are wrong, please correct them.
Hope we can make the service model agreement as much as we can.
Thanks.
BR
Maopeng_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
