Huabing,

Thanks for your input and for being the first to complete the survey!

If I understand your comments, *all* projects by default are using MSB 
through the service registration.  Would the question be more clear to ask 
if they are using the internal API Gateway?

By the way, the service mesh approach sounds great.


Regards,
Jason Hunt 
Executive Software Architect, IBM 

Phone: 314-749-7422
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @DJHunt
 



From:   <[email protected]>
To:     <[email protected]>
Cc:     <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Date:   11/29/2017 03:26 AM
Subject:        Re:[onap-discuss] [ptls] Please complete Beijing Software 
ArchitectureSurvey 



Hi Jason,

Thank you for the great effort and it's really helpful to reach our 
Beijing release goal!

I just want to clarify the question " Do you use MSB?" in the Survey 
because it may be confusing for the ptls.

As I presented at this week's Arch call, one of the most important design 
principles of MSB is providing Microservice Infrastructure which is 
transparent to the applications. So the projects can leverage the 
capability of MSB with minimum cost. It’s crucial because ONAP projects 
are polyglot and using different lib/framework.

For registration:
In Amsterdam release, MSB integrated with both OOM and heat template to 
automatically register service endpoints for all the microservices of ONAP 
project. 

For service communication:
The Internal API Gateway can handle the inter-service communication 
details including service discovery and load balancing without 
modification on the application side.

For Beijing and going forward, MSB will be continually evolving to support 
Carrier Grade Microservice Architecture for ONAP with Service Mesh.

Thanks,
Huabing
Original Mail
Sender:  <[email protected]>;
To:  <[email protected]>;
CC:  <[email protected]>;
Date: 2017/11/28 06:51
Subject: [onap-discuss] [ptls] Please complete Beijing Software 
ArchitectureSurvey
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Hi PTLs, 

With the Beijing focus on platform maturity (S3P/Carrier Grade) and 
software architecture, the architecture subcommittee would like to gather 
some information from the projects about the technology used, maturity 
evaluation, & skills.  We have created a survey at: 

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/X9F6HK6 

Please complete this survey by next Wednesday Dec. 6th, so that we can 
consolidate the information for our Santa Clara meeting. 

If you have questions or would prefer to discuss in a call, please let me 
know.  Also, if some of the information requested is available in your 
documentation, please just provide a pointer in the survey. 

THANK YOU! 


Regards,
Jason Hunt 
Executive Software Architect, IBM 

Phone: 314-749-7422
Email: [email protected] 
Twitter: @DJHunt 
 




_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to