This was the goal of the software architect subcommittee or system engineering subcommittee. We agreed that we would have a coordinator instead who would work under the architecture committee and with all PTLs to exercise the S3P criteria and other Beijing requirements. We also agreed last month that each PTL will get back to the TSC to tell us what they level they can meet and how.
Kenny Let’s please add this to the TSC meeting tomorrow. Mazin On Jan 3, 2018, at 12:02 AM, Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com<mailto:alla.gold...@amdocs.com>> wrote: Hi Jason, Helen, I fully agree with Helen and her proposal of having a smaller group to guide S3P requirements introduction into Beijing , If we count only on projects from now on to define their functionality aligned with S3P per agreed goals, we may end up with each project understanding (and implementing) those requirements differently, thus we may not have Beijing Release aligned with those requirements as a whole. Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology <image001.png> From: onap-usecasesub-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecasesub-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-usecasesub-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Yunxia Chen Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:21 AM To: Jason Hunt <djh...@us.ibm.com<mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com>> Cc: onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>; onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [Onap-usecasesub] [onap-discuss] [integration] ONAP S3P definition and matrix Hi, Jason, I agree with you that each project should have their own criteria. But after talking with some projects, I am not sure they have a clear idea how those high level “definition” could be reflected into their projects, (they need more help on those); and some S3P doesn’t make too much sense for them at this point, for example, (let’s also use A&AI), does it make sense to request A&AI to use metric for updating events if the bottleneck is at infrastructure level, querying the cloud? For the security requirement, are we really want ALL calls are “role-based access control and authorization”? I am not sure all project PTLs have realized the impact of this one for them. ☺ I will talk to Benchmark team to see what they could do for Beijing release. Regards, Helen Chen From: Jason Hunt <djh...@us.ibm.com<mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com>> Date: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 2:58 PM To: Helen Chen 00725961 <helen.c...@huawei.com<mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>> Cc: "onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>" <onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>, onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>" <onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] ONAP S3P definition and matrix Hi Helen, Those details have not been defined. The thought was for many of the criteria that the individual projects are in the best position to identify criteria appropriate to their project. So, for performance, as an example, maybe SO would identify and measure a criteria around request handling time, whereas AAI might use a metric around events received per second. (These are just examples). For stability, each project should identify & create the appropriate test transactions that would exercise 80% of their code. Then those tests would be run over a 72 hour period & monitored for any component failures. My hope is that the Benchmark team will be able to assist the project teams with the performance and stability testing. For resiliency, the level 2 criteria just says that there has to be automated failure detection and rerouting with no other qualifications on how "gracefully" that occurs. For that level, the teams should just gather how many requests are lost when failure happens under load (for stateless components), and gather what sort of data loss occurs when failure happens under load (for stateful components). Regards, Jason Hunt Executive Software Architect, IBM Phone: 314-749-7422 Email: djh...@us.ibm.com<mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com> Twitter: @DJHunt From: Yunxia Chen <helen.c...@huawei.com<mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>> To: Jason Hunt <djh...@us.ibm.com<mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com>> Cc: "onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>" <onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>, onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>" <onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>> Date: 01/02/2018 04:45 PM Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] ONAP S3P definition and matrix ________________________________ Hi, Jason, Thanks for the fast turnaround. I am looking for something more concrete and specific, for example, Performance: What exactly the criteria identified? • Speed of service provisioning? • How many particular operations can be processed in a second? • How many concurrent operations can be run in parallel without degradation? Stability: • Longevity tests? 72 hours? … What does 72 hour platform level soak w/random transactions mean here? • Resilience tests: verify graceful crash recovery?? If those are not defined yet, I suggest that we could have a small group of people to follow up and discuss them. Regards, Helen Chen From: Jason Hunt <djh...@us.ibm.com<mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com>> Date: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 2:26 PM To: Helen Chen 00725961 <helen.c...@huawei.com<mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>> Cc: "onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>" <onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>, onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>" <onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>>, "onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>" <onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration] ONAP S3P definition and matrix Hi Helen, Is this what you are looking for? - Approved levels for Platform Maturity Requirements for Beijing: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=15998867&preview=/16002054/20874800/Platform%20Maturity%20Level%20proposal%2013Dec2017v2.pdf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D15998867-26preview-3D_16002054_20874800_Platform-2520Maturity-2520Level-2520proposal-252013Dec2017v2.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oMOO2HmZ8JJWvUc1M7SklmdX3xn2mSb9tP9VrdTjcqg&m=tMV0nLwtbABeVKK9sYXxVaZXslUi9PfLB18MKzkU-iM&s=ixZ2Z-xC6fPm3-D9aOkGPWsG2PEPjgxhi8lsqnFkh-8&e=> - Full requirements definition: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=15998867<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D15998867&d=DwMGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oMOO2HmZ8JJWvUc1M7SklmdX3xn2mSb9tP9VrdTjcqg&m=tMV0nLwtbABeVKK9sYXxVaZXslUi9PfLB18MKzkU-iM&s=xoJvlvaoV4UJLaUHNMLrtnnCMbSrUl5XUschfBNGs3M&e=> Regards, Jason Hunt Executive Software Architect, IBM Phone: 314-749-7422 Email: djh...@us.ibm.com<mailto:djh...@us.ibm.com> Twitter: @DJHunt From: Yunxia Chen <helen.c...@huawei.com<mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>> To: "onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>" <onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>, "onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>" <onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>>, onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> Date: 01/02/2018 04:22 PM Subject: [onap-discuss] [integration] ONAP S3P definition and matrix Sent by: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> ________________________________ Hi, Chris & Alla, Happy new year! I am not sure whether I missed it over the holiday. Is there anywhere I could find the definition and matrix for ONAP S3P for Beijing release? Regards, Helen Chen_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oMOO2HmZ8JJWvUc1M7SklmdX3xn2mSb9tP9VrdTjcqg&m=1lEiYS-Miv5xr30-NyU6Q_DBYEM0h-7opXwGJjqVI1s&s=2p86n4_mfJwx3oP_BAJLiWBXBtWi9Q9Gsns7lcoDdzk&e= This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=T8LBQQqCZlsikut3elH-TAlZet81_LVblxwNfrDWEPQ&s=e-G7O2WkKrJSOO3rZ0nNEOFcQUaUvtnnp8QmWr8RFPU&e=> _______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=T8LBQQqCZlsikut3elH-TAlZet81_LVblxwNfrDWEPQ&s=Z7J8WsCQOjbhfZVcmsPNi7N_8O2J-M9f3KmATnrHtqE&e=
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
