As Pam noted, the configuration update flow gaps between Policy and DCAE will 
be addressed in R2. 

In the interim, the TCA configuration can be updated directly via CDAP GUI 
(this can be accessed via on cdap02 host and 11011 port). The policy 
configuration are identified as "tca_policy" under application preferences.

Regards,
Vijay

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DRAGOSH, PAM
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 8:20 AM
To: Alexis de Talhouët <[email protected]>; onap-discuss 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Policy][TCA] Relationship between Policy and 
tca_policy

*** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***.
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.

Alexis,



During Amsterdam post-RC1 it was determined that the DCAE team had expectations 
for the Policy API that would not work in their architecture. It was too late 
for Policy to make change the API to accommodate them. Thus, any updates will 
not work. I don’t know what the workaround is for DCAE as Policy does work with 
updates.



It was agreed to fix it in Beijing: POLICY-434 and DCAEGEN2196 are tracking 
this.



Regards,



Pam



Ps I can’t emphasize enough that help these teams (POLICY, DCAE, etc) need from 
other companies. These projects are not finished yet. In fact, DCAEGEN2 is 
brand new. There is still a lot of work to be done and I ask other companies 
within ONAP to help provide resources to harden, test and help fix issues.



On 1/12/18, 3:13 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of Alexis 
de Talhouët" <[email protected] on behalf of 
[email protected]> wrote:



    Hi experts,

    

    I’m trying to understand how Policy works. Hence I tried to update the vFW 
policy (MS) to reduce the thresholds. My expectation was to see this being 
applied to the TCA application, but it seems it didn’t pick it up, tca_policy 
in CDAP remained un-changed.

    

    What should be the process to update a policy, and have this update 
probably reflected in TCA?

    

    Thanks,

    Alexis

    _______________________________________________

    onap-discuss mailing list

    [email protected]

    
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=jwTiArcEj6aUX0HjV0M3dT12gUtk7rC07xpgpVZkS_4&m=HCMIEMWko9lPKkjqFMnASx5luljbnTjMLIClSlB0S2k&s=3jXal6Qt3V_-ZW1d6gBdbOelU5LhUqUydHHD6w7GuNI&e=
 

    



_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6WYcUG7NY-ZxfqWx5MmzVQ&m=_K3hbnpRCl8Bnj8G_mkv7sCbmMidFEkHpxLZg0qcR1E&s=eCa_6odRALg4ubGxX8MgTMzbuOPTK2rIPwuAF5E6248&e=
 
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to