Hi Bin,

Let’s discuss this further. VID weekly is in 15~ minutes:
https://zoom.us/j/167433926

Ofir

From: Yang, Bin [mailto:bin.y...@windriver.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2018 7:50 AM
To: Yunxia Chen <helen.c...@huawei.com>; Seshu m <seshu.kuma...@huawei.com>; 
Sonsino, Ofir <os0...@intl.att.com>; TIMONEY, DAN <dt5...@att.com>; PUTHENPURA, 
SARAT <sa...@research.att.com>
Cc: FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com>; Christopher Donley (Chris) 
<christopher.don...@huawei.com>; Stephen Terrill 
<stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>; Hellmann, Gil <gil.hellm...@windriver.com>; 
Zhang, Xiaohua <xiaohua.zh...@windriver.com>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Issue to be resolved: Consistent Representation and Identification 
of a cloud region in ONAP

Thanks Helen,

               I will be there, March 6th 10:30PM, China Time.

Best Regards,
Bin Yang,    Solution Readiness Team,    Wind River
Direct +86,10,84777126    Mobile +86,13811391682    Fax +86,10,64398189
Skype: yangbincs993

From: Yunxia Chen [mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2018 10:57 AM
To: Yang, Bin; Seshu m; Sonsino, Ofir; TIMONEY, DAN; PUTHENPURA, SARAT (SARAT)
Cc: FREEMAN, BRIAN D; Christopher Donley (Chris); Stephen Terrill; Hellmann, 
Gil; Zhang, Xiaohua; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: Issue to be resolved: Consistent Representation and Identification 
of a cloud region in ONAP

HI, Bin,
Very good idea. I will add that in this week’s integration meeting:
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6593670<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D6593670&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=YKrlt1M487Gbcxf6GKUYkdaaJq4RCPChFI2AKdT_bP8&m=sVwMolXLlUX9gyPBGQKxAJ72H0uxkisFTqVfdOdB5Rk&s=Xr4zv1sTYByP7fLtpBVM6LJfqdXrBvfhg7HMFhhKeZg&e=>

Regards,

Helen Chen

From: "Yang, Bin" <bin.y...@windriver.com<mailto:bin.y...@windriver.com>>
Date: Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 6:12 PM
To: Seshu m <seshu.kuma...@huawei.com<mailto:seshu.kuma...@huawei.com>>, 
"Sonsino, Ofir" <os0...@intl.att.com<mailto:os0...@intl.att.com>>, "TIMONEY, 
DAN" <dt5...@att.com<mailto:dt5...@att.com>>, Helen Chen 00725961 
<helen.c...@huawei.com<mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>, "PUTHENPURA, SARAT 
(SARAT)" <sa...@research.att.com<mailto:sa...@research.att.com>>
Cc: "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>, "Christopher 
Donley (Chris)" 
<christopher.don...@huawei.com<mailto:christopher.don...@huawei.com>>, Stephen 
Terrill <stephen.terr...@ericsson.com<mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>>, 
"Hellmann, Gil" 
<gil.hellm...@windriver.com<mailto:gil.hellm...@windriver.com>>, "Zhang, 
Xiaohua" <xiaohua.zh...@windriver.com<mailto:xiaohua.zh...@windriver.com>>, 
onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Issue to be resolved: Consistent Representation and Identification of 
a cloud region in ONAP

Hello Seshu, Dan, Helen, Sarat,
and those are concerned on Representation and Identification of a cloud region 
in ONAP,

               The expanding to multiple clouds is a key metric for success of 
ONAP, and you might already be aware the fact that: With ONAP Amsterdam 
release, it is kind of tricky and error prone to onboard a new cloud region 
into ONAP for the end-to-end test cases.
I had learned that fact and got plenty help from this community during setting 
up a demo of using ONAP to orchestrate the Clearwater vIMS across 2 cloud 
regions. So I posted the workarounds on wiki: 
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=25431491<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_pages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D25431491&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=YKrlt1M487Gbcxf6GKUYkdaaJq4RCPChFI2AKdT_bP8&m=sVwMolXLlUX9gyPBGQKxAJ72H0uxkisFTqVfdOdB5Rk&s=2HXpcglrqR6rxsTU05QT-ZKAOa3TQjiFXFojh53Z71E&e=>
               At the same time, I had presented this issue and the short term 
workaround and long term solution to ONAP community during both VF2F meeting 
and ONAP Arch meeting.  I got suggestion from Chris Donley and Stephen that we 
need figure out if it is possible to fix that in Beijing release. So that is 
why I come to you and wondering if I can get your kindly support. The summary 
of issue and the solutions can be found at wiki: 
https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/25429038/HowToAddNewCloudRegionAndThoughts.pdf?version=2&modificationDate=1520214136460&api=v2<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_download_attachments_25429038_HowToAddNewCloudRegionAndThoughts.pdf-3Fversion-3D2-26modificationDate-3D1520214136460-26api-3Dv2&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=YKrlt1M487Gbcxf6GKUYkdaaJq4RCPChFI2AKdT_bP8&m=sVwMolXLlUX9gyPBGQKxAJ72H0uxkisFTqVfdOdB5Rk&s=GOwIA_QjViF2w1WCi28Ij-NuNUdhE275BS8xETpCmd0&e=>

To highlight what the issue is and what the help is expected from your teams:
               1, There are multiple places to represent a single cloud region 
and inconsistent identification of a cloud region makes it is hard to onboard a 
new cloud region
               2, The short term workaround places another constraint on the 
“cloud-owner”, while the long term solution impose the API changes between 
VID/SO/SDNC, and perhaps OOF as well.

Please let me know if you can add this as an agenda to your weekly meeting this 
week so that I can explain more the details and estimate the possibility to fix 
that in Beijing release.

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Bin Yang,    Solution Readiness Team,    Wind River
Direct +86,10,84777126    Mobile +86,13811391682    Fax +86,10,64398189
Skype: yangbincs993

_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to