I played a bit with the common/postgres chart, and understand it is a WIP.
But have some questions:
- Should we expect a common chart to deploy in the same namespace as
the app requiring it?
Specifically, I found postgres deploys to default namespace, while my pod
deployed in onap namespace.
- Should a service ever deploy to default namespace? And if this is
allowed, does it imply that it is a "shared" service (i.e. used by more than 1
When I attempted helm install local/onap I observed several (non-common)
services, secrets and configmaps all in default namespace.
- Are there any access rule in Kubernetes that impact the naming
convention for locating a service in another namespace?
Specifically, I discovered my pod in onap namespace could not connect to host
"pgset" but it could connect to "pgset.default". Yet when I asked others if
this should be necessary, they said no.
onap-discuss mailing list