Dear All, Here's a call for comment on the class vs datatype categorization issue of the resource IM.
Current resource information model (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version) has all objects categorized as "class". There are comments stating that some of them should be "Datatype" instead of "Class". During the resource IM call, the participants have agreed to use the categorization in ETSI IFA015 v2.4.1 as a basis for discussion. More information can be found on the following wiki page: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Class+vs+Datatype+Categorization We would like to have one week's time to collect feedback from the community. Please comment on the wiki page above if you have any concern with the current proposal. Objects with no comment will be categorized accordingly, and those with comments will be discussed in the following calls. BR, DENG Hui
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
