Thanks, Vladimir,
5G task force: the following requests were received:
1. SON support
2. Network slicing support
3. Controllers architecture
I attach them to this email.
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
[cid:[email protected]]
From: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2018 6:17 PM
To: Alla Goldner <[email protected]>; [email protected];
onap-tsc <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC
Hi, Alla,
Thanks for sending this. To my deep regret, there is a problem. Cisco several
times expressed opposition to having SON in this release. The reason is that
the architecture for SON was never properly analyzed.
Therefore I request removal of the following items
1. SON - problem formulation
2. SON - problem solving
3. Slice optimization problem formulation
4. Slice optimization problem solving
For all four, the concern is about splitting of the SON procedure(s) into two
independent pieces.
For #3 and #4, in addition to that, there is no consistent definition yet (in
3GPP) of slice level performance measurements. With no performance
measurements, what kind of optimization can be arranged?
Thanks
Vladimir
From: Alla Goldner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:34 AM
To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; onap-tsc
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC
Hi Vladimir,
The implementation proposals for 5G use cases in Casablanca was also discussed
during several Usecase subcommittee meetings and presentation is uploaded for
yesterday's TSC meting
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/editpage.action?pageId=28381537
I also attach it.
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
[cid:[email protected]]
From: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:24 AM
To: Alla Goldner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; onap-tsc
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC
Alla,
Can you please clarify what exactly you received from 5G group?
Unless I am missing something, there was no 5G call to finally decide which use
cases are going to the use case subcommittee. There were several proposals
presented, most of them good, but even for those I have difficulty to
understand which of them (and which versions) have been ever endorsed by the 5G
group.
Thanks
Vladimir
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On
Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 7:58 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
onap-tsc <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC
Hi all,
As we didn't have any time left for use case discussion and approval during
yesterday's TSC meeting and likely will not have till the launch of Beijing due
to urgent Beijing related discussions, the meeting decision was that we will
host e2e use case approval discussions during Usecase subcommittee meetings on
Monday, 4 pm CET.
1. All use case authors - please make sure you distributed your
presentations for approval. So far, we've received 5G group, Edge Automation
and auto Scaling out
2. Kenny, as agreed, please make sure all PTLs aware the discussion will
take place during Use case subcommittee meeting
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
[cid:[email protected]]
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
<https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Alla,
Regarding the Casablanca use cases information – and the request was send
questions to the usecase sub-committe. I read the use case information that
was posted and some of the detailed information in the wiki.
I had a question about the 5G uses cases.
1. It refers to the evolution of the SDNR, however the architecture has
SDNC and APPC; I think that we need to phrase it in terms of those controllers
as we don’t have a SDNR as such in ONAP; (and the SDNR project is a sub-project
to SDNC. The architectural repsentation could be different, however the
architecture does have SDNC, and APPC and in the discussed longterm view a “NF
controller”. The APPC was for the “L4-L7” vnfs, which applies to the RAN NFs
(they are at that level the same as IMS or packet core).
2. The details of the 5G use case indicate that it has to be a single
controller. I believe I asked for clarification as to why this is to be the
case as I think this is limiting and don’t understand the need.
BR,
Steve.
<http://www.ericsson.com/>
STEPHEN TERRILL
Technology Specialist
POA Architecture and Solutions
Business Unit Digital Services
Ericsson
Ericsson R&D Center, via de los Poblados 13
28033, Madrid, Spain
Phone +34 339 3005
Mobile +34 609 168 515
[email protected]
www.ericsson.com
<http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign>
Legal entity: Ericsson España S.A, compay registration number ESA288568603.
This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis
of the terms set out at
www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer<http://www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer>
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi, Alla,
Thanks for sending this. To my deep regret, there is a problem. Cisco several
times expressed opposition to having SON in this release. The reason is that
the architecture for SON was never properly analyzed.
Therefore I request removal of the following items
1. SON - problem formulation
2. SON - problem solving
3. Slice optimization problem formulation
4. Slice optimization problem solving
For all four, the concern is about splitting of the SON procedure(s) into two
independent pieces.
For #3 and #4, in addition to that, there is no consistent definition yet (in
3GPP) of slice level performance measurements. With no performance
measurements, what kind of optimization can be arranged?
Thanks
Vladimir
From: Alla Goldner <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:34 AM
To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) <[email protected]>;
[email protected]; onap-tsc <[email protected]>;
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC
Hi Vladimir,
The implementation proposals for 5G use cases in Casablanca was also discussed
during several Usecase subcommittee meetings and presentation is uploaded for
yesterday’s TSC meting
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/editpage.action?pageId=28381537
I also attach it.
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
From: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:24 AM
To: Alla Goldner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; onap-tsc
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC
Alla,
Can you please clarify what exactly you received from 5G group?
Unless I am missing something, there was no 5G call to finally decide which use
cases are going to the use case subcommittee. There were several proposals
presented, most of them good, but even for those I have difficulty to
understand which of them (and which versions) have been ever endorsed by the 5G
group.
Thanks
Vladimir
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On
Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 7:58 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
onap-tsc <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC
Hi all,
As we didn’t have any time left for use case discussion and approval during
yesterday’s TSC meeting and likely will not have till the launch of Beijing due
to urgent Beijing related discussions, the meeting decision was that we will
host e2e use case approval discussions during Usecase subcommittee meetings on
Monday, 4 pm CET.
1. All use case authors – please make sure you distributed your
presentations for approval. So far, we’ve received 5G group, Edge Automation
and auto Scaling out
2. Kenny, as agreed, please make sure all PTLs aware the discussion will
take place during Use case subcommittee meeting
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
