Hi Dileep, I’m occupied with something else today. I understand that the team is working to set up OOF in SB07 in the rest of the day. I’ll be able to retest vCPE in SB07 without OOF tonight. If everything works well, we can test it with OOF tomorrow.
Regards, Kang From: Ranganathan, Dileep [mailto:dileep.ranganat...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 11:42 To: PATEL, ANKITKUMAR N (ANKITKUMAR N) <an...@research.att.com>; Arun Arora (c) <aroraa...@vmware.com>; Kang Xi <kang...@huawei.com>; Sood, Ritu <ritu.s...@intel.com> Cc: Williams, Marcus <marcus.willi...@intel.com>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Shankaranarayanan P N <shankarp...@gmail.com> Subject: RE: OOF integration testing Hi Kang, When are you planning to test in SB-07? We are working on populating the data required for OOF. Thanks, Dileep From: PATEL, ANKITKUMAR N (ANKITKUMAR N) [mailto:an...@research.att.com] Sent: Monday, June 4, 2018 11:21 AM To: Arun Arora (c) <aroraa...@vmware.com<mailto:aroraa...@vmware.com>>; Kang Xi <kang...@huawei.com<mailto:kang...@huawei.com>>; Ranganathan, Dileep <dileep.ranganat...@intel.com<mailto:dileep.ranganat...@intel.com>>; Sood, Ritu <ritu.s...@intel.com<mailto:ritu.s...@intel.com>> Cc: Williams, Marcus <marcus.willi...@intel.com<mailto:marcus.willi...@intel.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Shankaranarayanan P N <shankarp...@gmail.com<mailto:shankarp...@gmail.com>> Subject: Re: OOF integration testing + Dileep, Ritu From: "Arun Arora (c)" <aroraa...@vmware.com<mailto:aroraa...@vmware.com>> Date: Sunday, June 3, 2018 at 10:56 PM To: Kang Xi <kang...@huawei.com<mailto:kang...@huawei.com>> Cc: "Williams, Marcus" <marcus.willi...@intel.com<mailto:marcus.willi...@intel.com>>, "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>" <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>, "PATEL, ANKITKUMAR N (ANKITKUMAR N)" <an...@research.att.com<mailto:an...@research.att.com>>, Shankaranarayanan P N <shankarp...@gmail.com<mailto:shankarp...@gmail.com>> Subject: RE: OOF integration testing Hi Kang, Thanks for your support. I, Shankar and team would be glad to work together with you for Integration testing with multi-cloud. Best Regards, Arun Arora From: Shankaranarayanan P N [mailto:shankarp...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 June 2018 19:05 To: Kang Xi <kang...@huawei.com<mailto:kang...@huawei.com>> Cc: Williams, Marcus <marcus.willi...@intel.com<mailto:marcus.willi...@intel.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Arun Arora (c) <aroraa...@vmware.com<mailto:aroraa...@vmware.com>>; PATEL, ANKITKUMAR N (ANKITKUMAR N) <an...@research.att.com<mailto:an...@research.att.com>> Subject: Re: OOF integration testing Hi Kang, We should be able to switch to SB07 and setup OOF there quite easily. Please do let us know when you would like us to get on to it. Thanks, Shankar. On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:47 PM Kang Xi <kang...@huawei.com<mailto:kang...@huawei.com>> wrote: Suppose we switch to SB07 to test the whole flow as part of vCPE, how much config overhead do you have for OOF? I’m currently busy fixing the last few bugs for OOM, but will be able to work with you early next week. Regards, Kang From: Shankaranarayanan P N [mailto:shankarp...@gmail.com<mailto:shankarp...@gmail.com>] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2018 13:46 To: Kang Xi <kang...@huawei.com<mailto:kang...@huawei.com>> Cc: Williams, Marcus <marcus.willi...@intel.com<mailto:marcus.willi...@intel.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; aroraa...@vmware.com<mailto:aroraa...@vmware.com>; PATEL, ANKITKUMAR N (ANKITKUMAR N) <an...@research.att.com<mailto:an...@research.att.com>> Subject: Re: OOF integration testing Hi Kang, Helen, We have now completed all our pairwise testing on both OOM (SB00) and HEAT (SB01). Based on the incremental testing proposal we discussed when we last met, we have been verifying our pairwise tests using the vCPE data and flows, so that it will get us along with the vCPE integration testing as well. In SB01 (HEAT), we have gotten along further in the vCPE flows beyond SO-OOF homing including the HPA functionality. In SB00 (OOM), we currently running the vCPE flows prior to homing so that we have the data that is needed for the Homing and HPA. Given this, we would be grateful if you could advise on how best to proceed with this integration testing. Should we continue using SB00/SB01 and you could help verify if this works end to end for vCPE or would you prefer to have this testing done in any other lab where you are currently testing vCPE? Please do let us know. Thanks, Shankar. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:38 AM Shankaranarayanan P N <shankarp...@gmail.com<mailto:shankarp...@gmail.com>> wrote: Thanks, Kang. As discussed, Here's list of things we need to discuss and address: * placementDemands should include the vgMuxInfra and vG * BRG should be removed from the placementDemands since it is a PNF and homing doesn't really make sense given its location is already fixed. * the licenceDemand section should be removed (potentially) since we aren't really doing any license optimization in R2. Also, the testing would involve two incremental steps: Step 1. Test the basic Homing workflow for vCPE with the air-distance and colocation constraints (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/HAS+%28R2%29+Beijing+Release+planning<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fwiki.onap.org-252Fdisplay-252FDW-252FHAS-252B-252528R2-252529-252BBeijing-252BRelease-252Bplanning-26data-3D02-257C01-257Caroraarun-2540vmware.com-257Cc95784f4789e4b59722008d5c88dab8d-257Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0-257C1-257C0-257C636635433155652170-26sdata-3D1hkQS29nSX5fsFJyuuBsm9mgjbkEODXyy-252FNgwDXkUKU-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=JLfR_kneHHc5iX43PjhysvkbZJBBAerZ0eTlpcAMLmk&m=3Kwenre6idO8y7vLSygoywWcri4SEVnhdjHqIMYiuy8&s=GXt_CVdNQAQ4N_83s554ZfUg_3n6mAI18PiHO3Ej0_s&e=>). Step 2. Add the HPA and MultiCloud capacity check policies, and test with the functional test cases. The first step would ease us into the workflow replacing the SNIRO emulator, while step 2 would test all the functional features we support in R2. Thanks, Shankar. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:24 AM Kang Xi <kang...@huawei.com<mailto:kang...@huawei.com>> wrote: Shankar, Please get the SNIRO request and response here: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16008042/sniro_request.json?version=1&modificationDate=1526916059788&api=v2<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fwiki.onap.org-252Fdownload-252Fattachments-252F16008042-252Fsniro-5Frequest.json-253Fversion-253D1-2526modificationDate-253D1526916059788-2526api-253Dv2-26data-3D02-257C01-257Caroraarun-2540vmware.com-257Cc95784f4789e4b59722008d5c88dab8d-257Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0-257C1-257C0-257C636635433155662178-26sdata-3DaIPUHdpxwiC4JPHF2bAtENhl2UPwqJmNudXprR78cPM-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=JLfR_kneHHc5iX43PjhysvkbZJBBAerZ0eTlpcAMLmk&m=3Kwenre6idO8y7vLSygoywWcri4SEVnhdjHqIMYiuy8&s=A3afel9W4EccSrvQRCfw5-LJ0GjjP5AdWlKpS-3u1Ek&e=> https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16008042/sniro_response.json?version=1&modificationDate=1526916059957&api=v2<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fwiki.onap.org-252Fdownload-252Fattachments-252F16008042-252Fsniro-5Fresponse.json-253Fversion-253D1-2526modificationDate-253D1526916059957-2526api-253Dv2-26data-3D02-257C01-257Caroraarun-2540vmware.com-257Cc95784f4789e4b59722008d5c88dab8d-257Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0-257C1-257C0-257C636635433155672187-26sdata-3D5h9dGtFu4JcwrO4S0EMh5Hd2fAdSGzgVI9hFKuCbg8E-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=JLfR_kneHHc5iX43PjhysvkbZJBBAerZ0eTlpcAMLmk&m=3Kwenre6idO8y7vLSygoywWcri4SEVnhdjHqIMYiuy8&s=ywYI3HubPVYusNgzE_xdOjzm98FOSkSW2_4jeouC8Ok&e=> Marcus, I’ll set up a short meeting later today so that Shankar, you, and me can sync up on the test. Thanks. Regards, Kang From: Shankaranarayanan P N [mailto:shankarp...@gmail.com<mailto:shankarp...@gmail.com>] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 10:16 To: Yunxia Chen <helen.c...@huawei.com<mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>> Cc: Gildas Lanilis <gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>; PATEL, ANKITKUMAR N (ANKITKUMAR N) <an...@research.att.com<mailto:an...@research.att.com>>; ritu.s...@intel.com<mailto:ritu.s...@intel.com>; LEFEVRE, CATHERINE <cl6...@intl.att.com<mailto:cl6...@intl.att.com>>; FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>; sa...@research.att.com<mailto:sa...@research.att.com>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Kang Xi <kang...@huawei.com<mailto:kang...@huawei.com>> Subject: Re: OOF integration testing Thanks, Helen. Kang, Please let me know when we could discuss about the schedule and priority for this testing. Thanks, Shankar. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:04 AM Yunxia Chen <helen.c...@huawei.com<mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi, Shankar, Thanks for the update. Please discuss with Kang, added on this maillist, on schedule and priority. Regards, Helen Chen From: Shankaranarayanan P N <shankarp...@gmail.com<mailto:shankarp...@gmail.com>> Date: Friday, May 18, 2018 at 10:21 AM To: Helen Chen 00725961 <helen.c...@huawei.com<mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>, Gildas Lanilis <gildas.lani...@huawei.com<mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com>>, "PATEL, ANKITKUMAR N (ANKITKUMAR N)" <an...@research.att.com<mailto:an...@research.att.com>>, "ritu.s...@intel.com<mailto:ritu.s...@intel.com>" <ritu.s...@intel.com<mailto:ritu.s...@intel.com>>, "LEFEVRE, CATHERINE" <cl6...@intl.att.com<mailto:cl6...@intl.att.com>>, "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>>, "sa...@research.att.com<mailto:sa...@research.att.com>" <sa...@research.att.com<mailto:sa...@research.att.com>>, onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> Subject: OOF integration testing Hi Helen, Gildas, Following up on our earlier meeting regarding the integration testing, I wanted to reach out and provide an update on the progress here as you requested. We have completed all the pairwise testing with our downstream dependencies (AAI, MultiCloud, Policy), and expect to complete the Northbound testing with SO in a short while. In order to simultaneously progress alongside the integration testing efforts, we have been primarily using the vCPE workflows for our pairwise testing. Since OOF is called by SO for homing in the vCPEResCust instantiation workflow, I wanted to check if the following plan for the testing would work: 1. Test the basic Homing workflow for vCPE with minimal constraints (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/HAS+%28R2%29+Beijing+Release+planning<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fwiki.onap.org-252Fdisplay-252FDW-252FHAS-252B-252528R2-252529-252BBeijing-252BRelease-252Bplanning-26data-3D02-257C01-257Caroraarun-2540vmware.com-257Cc95784f4789e4b59722008d5c88dab8d-257Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0-257C1-257C0-257C636635433155672187-26sdata-3DzXH6FAK60D21eZaxyJdatGWojURmPhy2qOFIcDk00-252BY-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=JLfR_kneHHc5iX43PjhysvkbZJBBAerZ0eTlpcAMLmk&m=3Kwenre6idO8y7vLSygoywWcri4SEVnhdjHqIMYiuy8&s=zONPLShC9riRzc6GTYeYWwyM03M4RSMD3MzlOzUXeE4&e=>). This would, in effect, replace the SNIRO emulator stub in R1 flows with OOF homing workflow. 2. Add the HPA and MultiCloud capacity check policies, and test with the functional test cases. This way, we can start off with an initial but meaningful test and make progress incrementally by adding more complex policies. Please let us know if this sounds reasonable. Thank you so much for your help with the testing efforts ! Thanks, Shankar.
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
