Modeling Subcommittee: I was reviewing the Casablanca Release Deck <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/TSC+2018-07-05+Meeting+Agenda?preview=%2F33067338%2F36963870%2FONAP+Casablanca+M1+Status+Summary+Version4.pdf> which Gildas presented today on the TSC call and the TSC approved.
In looking at the Modeling Project Casablanca M1 checklist <https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=35524278> (R3 Scope), I noticed that most all of the Epics and Stories are for developing service and resource Information Models and Data Models and their mappings. These items are not part of the Modeling Project scope <https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3247202>, but are part of the Modeling Subcommittee activities. This has created a lot of confusion as to what the Modeling Project scope and responsibility is versus the Modeling Subcommittee. Can we get clarification? In addition, I (again) recommend we change the name of the modeling project to eliminate confusion. For example, Model Parsers project. Thanks -- Brian Hedstrom Founder/CEO OAM Technology Consulting LLC oam.technology [email protected] 720-470-7091 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10896): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/10896 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23168988/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
