Hi, David,

We haven’t scaled anything up to 30 million nodes, but we have seen instances 
with over a million – the backend can be distributed across multiple nodes. 
We’re using JanusGraph and Cassandra in the Beijing release – I’d be interested 
to hear if you have had any success scaling up or want to contribute to load / 
performance testing use cases in a lab environment  We have our weekly calls at 
9AM EDT on Wednesdays.

Thanks,
jimmy

From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 10:31 AM
To: "FORSYTH, JAMES" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "BHOJAN, SUMITHRA" 
<[email protected]>, "YING, SHAWN" <[email protected]>
Subject: AAI scalabilty

Dear Jimmy,

I am working in the ONAP’s OSAM (Open Source Access Manager) use case together 
with Sumithra, Bora and Shawn (in CC).
We are currently discussing whether we can use ONAP to deploy customer facing 
fixed broadband internet access services, similar to what the vCPE use case did.
In this case, we may need to store service instance information per customer, 
which may mean something around 30 million service instances for some service 
providers.
We are wondering whether AAI might scale to those numbers. As I understood from 
some colleagues at the Casablanca developer forum, it should be no problem as 
AAI uses a distributed DB underneath (HBase?) that can scale by adding more 
nodes to it.
Is my understanding correct? was AAI scalability considered in the vCPE use 
case? I would appreciate if you can give us some hints on this topic.

Regards,
David

--
David Pérez Caparrós
Senior Innovation Engineer
Swisscom (Switzerland)
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#10962): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/10962
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23199259/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to