Hi Anatoly


    


    I attended the meeting, which is great for SDC service introdution and DM 
discussion.


    

    For NS IM in etsi, please refer to 
https://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/Open/Publications_pdf/Specs-Reports/NFV-IFA%20014v2.4.1%20-%20GS%20-%20Network%20Service%20Templates%20Spec.pdf

    For NS DM in etsi, it is in discusing, refer to 
https://docbox.etsi.org/ISG/NFV/Open/Drafts/SOL001_TOSCA_desc/NFV-SOL001v090.zip

    If SDC data model can support NS, it will be greatful, especially NSDF, 
VNFFG,etc feature in the future cases, which is more related to the resource 
layer model.




    Product, service, resource concepts mainly come from  TMF.  TMF regards the 
ETSI NS as resource composite. 

    If ONAP supposes to support service, please consider what service we want, 
resource composite or TMF service.


    If I am wrong, please correct me.






    I also put my ideas in the wiki:


    
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+Interest+Group+2018-07-30+Meeting+Minutes


   


   NS DM as a requirement is passed in model meeting. 


   NS IM has been in the clean page.


   NFVO need the NS as data model, hope to get some consensus.






   If more issued needs to discuss, please comment on the wiki.


   https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ZTE+Proposal+for+Network+Service+Descriptor 






   Thanks






BR


Maopeng



原始邮件



发件人:张茂鹏10030173
收件人:Katzman,Anatoly <[email protected]>
抄送人:[email protected] <[email protected]>WECHSLER, CHESLA C 
<[email protected]>Alexander Vul <[email protected]>Anatoly Katzman 
<[email protected]>Andrei Kojukhov <[email protected]>GUPTA, ARUN 
<[email protected]>BAXTER, ANDREW <[email protected]>COAN, BILL 
<[email protected]>HU, BIN <[email protected]>chuanyu chen 
<[email protected]>Chuyi Guo <[email protected]>BULLARD, GIL 
<[email protected]>Hui Deng <[email protected]>Eshet, Itamar 
<[email protected]>JacquelineBeaulac 
<[email protected]>Janusz Pieczerak 
<[email protected]>Jessie S Jewitt 
<[email protected]>SCAGGS, KEVIN <[email protected]>Lianhao Lu 
<[email protected]>Lingli Deng <[email protected]>Marek Kukulski 
<[email protected]>NUTAKKI, MADHU <[email protected]>Priya TG 
<[email protected]>shitao li <[email protected]>Thinh Nguyenphu 
<[email protected]>Victor Gao <[email protected]>尚小冬10032185;Xu 
Yang <[email protected]>Zhong Heliu <[email protected]>黄卓垚10112215;
日 期 :2018年07月30日 19:15
主 题 :答复: Data Model Interest Group agenda for 2018-07-30 #modeling




Hi Anatoly


  


    Thanks Anatoly.  






     Here are some contexts, which will help the discussion.

    1.SDO progresses:

       1.1 TMF support service and resource, and also in resource layer, there 
is resource composite. and Network service from ETSI has been mapping to the 
resource composite







            please refer to TMF document: 
tr255-resource-function-activation-and-configuration-suite-r17-5-0

       1.2  3GPP management system support to integrate with ETSI MANO system.

       1.3  ETSI SOL001 has the draft of NS data model and Information model

     2.model subcommittee progress:


 Network service is agreed in resource IM group. Networkservice IM
 Network service Descriptor has been discussed in DM group. Networkservice DM


    3. Service providers are interested in ETSI NS.


    4. VFC project impliments NFVO and needs NS template






     My work aims to support the following:


       1, impliment network service template aligned to the ETSI SOL001/004


       2, impliment network service in the resource, aligned to the ETSI, TMF, 
and 3GPP.






     If I am wrong, please corrrect me.


     Thanks.






BR


Maopeng










发件人:Katzman,Anatoly <[email protected]>
收件人:[email protected] <[email protected]>
抄送人:WECHSLER, CHESLA C <[email protected]>Alexander Vul 
<[email protected]>Anatoly Katzman <[email protected]>Andrei Kojukhov 
<[email protected]>GUPTA, ARUN <[email protected]>BAXTER, ANDREW 
<[email protected]>COAN, BILL <[email protected]>HU, BIN 
<[email protected]>chuanyu chen <[email protected]>Chuyi Guo 
<[email protected]>BULLARD, GIL <[email protected]>Hui Deng 
<[email protected]>Eshet, Itamar <[email protected]>JacquelineBeaulac 
<[email protected]>Janusz Pieczerak 
<[email protected]>Jessie S Jewitt 
<[email protected]>SCAGGS, KEVIN <[email protected]>Lianhao Lu 
<[email protected]>Lingli Deng <[email protected]>张茂鹏10030173;Marek 
Kukulski <[email protected]>NUTAKKI, MADHU <[email protected]>Priya TG 
<[email protected]>shitao li <[email protected]>Thinh Nguyenphu 
<[email protected]>Victor Gao <[email protected]>尚小冬10032185;Xu 
Yang <[email protected]>Zhong Heliu <[email protected]>黄卓垚10112215;
日 期 :2018年07月30日 17:17
主 题 :Data Model Interest Group agenda for 2018-07-30 #modeling




Dear modelers,


Last time we met, Maopeng Zhang of ZTE presented a set of requirements for the 
networking service model.


Today on our weekly call 
(https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+Interest+Group+2018-07-30+Meeting+Minutes),
 I will present an initial proposal for the internal ONAP data model of 
service, and then we all will examine whether it stands  the requirements. In 
addition, we will start a discussion on the internal ONAP data model of PNF.


See you there,


Anatoly Katzman
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#11607): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11607
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23858363/21656
Mute #modeling: https://lists.onap.org/mk?hashtag=modeling&subid=2740164
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to