Let’s continue with this thread for input as well as tracking all the issue discussion during the Pair and/or E2E CCVPN test.
Thanks. ________________________________ Xin Miao M: +1-4692685226 From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) To: Xin Miao<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Rama Subba Reddy S<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;莫国彪<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;Vidyashree Rama<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: CL Test Steps for Phase 1 Time: 2018-08-20 11:40:06 Please follow https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Developer+Best+Practices What you create should follow the tutorials underneath this wiki: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/R3+Deploying+and+Debugging+the+Policy+Platform Pam From: Xin Miao <[email protected]> Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 12:21 PM To: "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" <[email protected]> Cc: Rama Subba Reddy S <[email protected]>, 莫国彪 <[email protected]>, Vidyashree Rama <[email protected]> Subject: FW: CL Test Steps for Phase 1 Hi, Pam, We are modifying drools-applications code to support CCVPN closed loop with new SO recipes. What will be the best way for us to conduct our unit or module test? Is there any instruction or wiki page that we can follow? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [id:[email protected]] From: DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 2018年8月20日 AM 7:20 To: Xin Miao <[email protected]> Subject: Re: CL Test Steps for Phase 1 Abatement is optional �C but you should specify that in the policy so the policy enforcement knows to not wait for it. We know that sometimes it is difficult in the DCAE side to determine if an abatement has happened, thus we enabled that option in the Policy Operational YAML specification. Just be sure that we don’t get subsequent ONSET’s after we have done all the SO work. If that is not possible then utilize a Frequency Limiter Guard policy as a last resort to prevent the whole process from being initiated immediately after it was done. I would test and develop everything first, see how the system works before going down that route. Pam From: Xin Miao <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 12:03 AM To: "DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: FW: CL Test Steps for Phase 1 Hi, Pam, For CCVPN Closed loop phase 1 runtime test step below. Do the last 3 steps have to be there? Or, these Abated steps/events processing are optional? Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [cid:[email protected]] From: Xin Miao Sent: 2018年8月19日 PM 10:59 To: Rama Subba Reddy S <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Vidyashree Rama <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Gaurav agrawal <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; yuchaode <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: CL Test Steps for Phase 1 Hi, Rama/Vidya, The following are the closed loop test steps at runtime: * Link between TP1 from site A and TP2 from site B is brought down * ACTN from site A sends TP1 Status ‘down’ notification to Restconf collector and publishes corresponding json notification to DMAAP * ACTN from site B sends TP2 Status ‘down’ notification to the same Restconf collector and publishes corresponding json notification to DMAAP * Both of the notifications are consumed by VES Mapper and converted to VES Fault_Route_Status events. * Holmes receives the two events * Holmes does correlation of the two events and generate one signature event and sends it to Policy * Policy triggers operational policy and healing action is sent to SO * SO deletes the associated 3 service instances. * SO recreates these 3 service instances again over a new link between TP3 and TP4 across site A and site B Need to decide about if the following steps has to be done at the closed loop: (may not be necessary ??) * Service ‘up’ notifications are sent from ACTN when service is recovered. * Holmes does the event correlation and sends Clear signature event to Policy * Policy stops the healing action Thank you and best regards, Xin Miao American Network Technology Lab Futurewei Technologies, Inc. 5340 Legacy Dr., Suite 175 Plano, TX 75024 Phone: 469-277-5884; Mobile:469-268-5226 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [cid:[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11972): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11972 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/24875324/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
