Actually that is completely non-negotiable; anything discussed in a breakout discussion MUST be taken back to a general, and fully public subcommittee call before any decision can be made.
…same song I've been singing for a couple of weeks now. ;-) Best Regards, -kenny Kenny Paul, Technical Program Manager, The Linux Foundation kp...@linuxfoundation.org, 510.766.5945 San Francisco Bay Area, Pacific Time Zone From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> On Behalf Of WECHSLER, CHESLA C Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 8:43 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Agreements on Montreal offline discussion of Resource IM and Service IM ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. Because of the lack of good audio in the breakout sessions (and really, in general), I think we can only come out of Montreal with proposals to bring back to the normal call for discussion and approval. Not all key people were able to travel to Montreal unfortunately. Deng, Andy, what do you think? Chesla -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13403): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13403 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27796546/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
