Thanks Jason, Is there anything else I can help with to formalize this decision and add this requirement to S3P?
Adolfo On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 8:07 PM Jason Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm open to either approach. I am a little concerned about adding to the > S3P list, as it has been a challenge to meet even the existing > requirements. However, if there is already full support, and the work to > the project teams is minimal, then I think it could work. > > > > Regards, > Jason Hunt > Distinguished Engineer, IBM > > Phone: 314-749-7422 > Email: [email protected] > Twitter: @DJHunt > > > > > From: Gildas Lanilis <[email protected]> > To: Adolfo Perez-Duran <[email protected]>, " > [email protected]" <[email protected]>, Jason Hunt < > [email protected]>, "[email protected]" < > [email protected]> > Cc: Tina Tsou <[email protected]>, Brian Hedstrom < > [email protected]>, Bob Monkman <[email protected]>, > Yunxia Chen <[email protected]> > Date: 10/23/2018 05:29 PM > Subject: RE: Non-functional requirement proposal for Dublin: > Adopting ONAP Normative Base Images > ------------------------------ > > > > Hi, > > I see 2 approaches: > 1) Make it part of one of the S3P dimension > 2) Or include it in the Non-functional requirement list (example: as > we did in Casablanca at > *https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+Release+Requirements#CasablancaReleaseRequirements-NonFunctionalRequirements* > <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+Release+Requirements#CasablancaReleaseRequirements-NonFunctionalRequirements> > ) > > Thanks, > Gildas > ONAP Release Manager > 1 415 238 6287 > > *From:* Adolfo Perez-Duran [mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 23, 2018 11:39 AM > *To:* [email protected]; Gildas Lanilis <[email protected]>; > Jason Hunt <[email protected]>; [email protected] > *Cc:* Tina Tsou <[email protected]>; Brian Hedstrom < > [email protected]>; Bob Monkman <[email protected]>; > Yunxia Chen <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Non-functional requirement proposal for Dublin: Adopting ONAP > Normative Base Images > > Alla, Gildas, Jason > > Could you advise on the process we should follow to introduce this > non-functional requirement to the Dublin release? > > *Requirement: Use ONAP Normative Base Images to Improve deployability and > reduce footprint and resource consumption* > > *Rationale:* > Both operators looking to experiment with ONAP and developers producing > ONAP containers report long build times and high resource consumption. The > OOM team also reports long deployment times and high resource consumption. > > Furthermore, small, efficient images also address the issue some operators > have reported when they have attempted to deploy ONAP to "kick the tires." > > *Proposed solution and benefits:* > ONAP's CIA project has identified a set of container base images that, if > adopted, would alleviate the problems of resource consumption and long > build times ONAP projects are experiencing. > > Experiments conducted with the proposed base images have produced > container images that were up to two orders of magnitude smaller. Smaller > images translate into smaller build and deploy times as well as smaller > footprint. > > *Community support:* > The idea of using these normative base images was presented to the PTL > community on October 8th, 2018. There is consensus and support for the > adoption of these base images and for the introduction of a non-functional > requirement for Dublin. > > It was suggested that also cover the requirement under S3P, Jason Hunt has > been made aware of the requirement. > > *Timeline:* > We propose that the requirement be met by M3. > > Thanks, > > Adolfo > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13437): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13437 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27571472/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
